Suppr超能文献

入院时吸入性损伤严重程度评分预测烧伤患者的总体生存率。

Inhalation Injury Severity Score on Admission Predicts Overall Survival in Burn Patients.

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.

U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1273-1277. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad083.

Abstract

Inhalation injury is diagnosed in up to one-third of burn patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There are multiple scoring systems to grade inhalation injury, but no study has evaluated the ability of these scoring systems to predict outcomes of interest such as overall survival. We conducted a prospective, observational study of 99 intubated burn patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy within 24 hr of admission and graded inhalation injury using three scoring systems: abbreviated injury score (AIS), inhalation injury severity score (I-ISS), and mucosal score (MS). Agreement between scoring systems was assessed with Krippendorff's alpha (KA). Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine if variables were associated with overall survival. At admission, median AIS, I-ISS, and MS scores were 2 for all scoring systems. Patients who died had higher overall injury burden than those who survived and had similar median admission AIS and MS scores, but higher I-ISS scores. There was strong correlation between the inhalation injury grade at admission using the three scoring systems (KA = 0.85). On regression analysis, the only scoring system independently associated with overall survival was I-ISS (score 3 compared to scores 1-2: OR 13.16, 95% CI 1.65-105.07; P = .02). Progression of injury after initial assessment may contribute to the poor correlation between admission score and overall survival for injuries graded with AIS and MS. Repeated assessment may more accurately identify patients at increased risk for mortality.

摘要

吸入性损伤在多达三分之一的烧伤患者中被诊断出来,与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。有多种评分系统来分级吸入性损伤,但没有研究评估这些评分系统预测总体生存率等感兴趣结局的能力。我们对 99 例接受纤维支气管镜检查的气管插管烧伤患者进行了前瞻性观察性研究,这些患者在入院后 24 小时内进行了纤维支气管镜检查,并使用三种评分系统(简明损伤评分(AIS)、吸入性损伤严重程度评分(I-ISS)和黏膜评分(MS))对吸入性损伤进行分级。使用 Krippendorff's alpha(KA)评估评分系统之间的一致性。进行多变量分析以确定变量是否与总体生存率相关。入院时,所有评分系统的 AIS、I-ISS 和 MS 评分中位数均为 2。死亡患者的总体损伤负担高于存活患者,且入院时 AIS 和 MS 评分中位数相似,但 I-ISS 评分较高。使用三种评分系统评估的入院时吸入性损伤严重程度之间存在很强的相关性(KA=0.85)。回归分析显示,唯一与总体生存率独立相关的评分系统是 I-ISS(评分 3 与评分 1-2 相比:OR 13.16,95%CI 1.65-105.07;P=0.02)。初始评估后损伤的进展可能导致 AIS 和 MS 分级的损伤入院评分与总体生存率之间的相关性较差。重复评估可能更准确地识别出死亡率增加风险较高的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验