• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术工作组在促进马拉维卫生部循证决策方面的功能:一项横断面定性研究。

Functionality of technical working groups in enabling evidence-informed decision-making within Malawi's Ministry of Health: a cross-sectional qualitative study.

机构信息

Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.

Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 6;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00987-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-023-00987-7
PMID:37280657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10243690/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The roles and functionality of technical working groups (TWGs) in the health sectors vary across countries, still they aim to support government and ministries in formulating evidence-informed recommendations for policies and facilitate dialogue and alignment of activities among stakeholders within the health sector. Thus, TWGs have a role in enhancing the functionality and effectiveness of the health system structure. However, in Malawi, the functionality of TWGs and how they utilize research evidence to contribute to decision-making is not monitored. This study sought to understand the TWGs' performance and functionality in enabling evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) in Malawi's health sector.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected through interviews, documents review and observation of three TWG meetings. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach. The WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) was used to guide the assessment of TWG functionality.

RESULTS

TWG functionality varied in the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Malawi. The reasons for those perceived to be functioning well included meeting frequently, diverse representation of members, and that their recommendations to MoH were usually considered when decisions were made. For the TWGs that were perceived as not functioning well, the main reasons included lack of funding, periodic meetings and discussions that needed to provide clear decisions on the actions to be taken. In addition, evidence was recognized as important in decision-making, and research was valued by decision-makers within the MoH. However, some of the TWGs lacked reliable mechanisms for generating, accessing and synthesizing research. They also needed more capacity to review and use the research to inform their decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

TWGs are highly valued and play a critical role in strengthening EIDM within the MoH. Our paper highlights the complexity and barriers of TWG functionality in supporting pathways for health policy-making in Malawi. These results have implications for EIDM in the health sector. This suggests that the MoH should actively develop reliable interventions and evidence tools, strengthen capacity-building and increase funding for EIDM.

摘要

背景

技术工作组(TWG)在卫生部门的角色和职能因国家而异,但它们旨在支持政府和部委制定基于证据的政策建议,并促进卫生部门利益相关者之间的对话和活动协调。因此,TWG 在增强卫生系统结构的功能和有效性方面发挥作用。然而,在马拉维,TWG 的功能以及它们如何利用研究证据为决策做出贡献并没有得到监测。本研究旨在了解 TWG 在促进马拉维卫生部门循证决策(EIDM)方面的表现和功能。

方法

这是一项横断面描述性定性研究。通过访谈、文件审查和观察三次 TWG 会议收集数据。使用主题方法分析定性数据。采用世界卫生组织-联合国儿童基金会联合报告表(JRF)来指导 TWG 功能评估。

结果

TWG 在马拉维卫生部的功能存在差异。那些被认为运作良好的 TWG 的原因包括频繁开会、成员的多样化代表,以及他们向卫生部提出的建议通常在做出决策时被考虑。对于那些被认为运作不佳的 TWG,主要原因包括缺乏资金、定期会议和讨论,这些会议和讨论需要就将要采取的行动做出明确的决定。此外,证据被认为是决策的重要因素,研究受到卫生部决策者的重视。然而,一些 TWG 缺乏生成、获取和综合研究的可靠机制。他们还需要更多的能力来审查和利用研究来为他们的决策提供信息。

结论

TWG 受到高度重视,在加强卫生部循证决策方面发挥着关键作用。我们的论文强调了 TWG 功能在支持马拉维卫生政策制定途径方面的复杂性和障碍。这些结果对卫生部门的循证决策具有启示意义。这表明卫生部应积极制定可靠的干预措施和证据工具,加强能力建设,并增加循证决策的资金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/10245510/af694cea5c59/12961_2023_987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/10245510/c603ccb477d0/12961_2023_987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/10245510/af694cea5c59/12961_2023_987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/10245510/c603ccb477d0/12961_2023_987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/10245510/af694cea5c59/12961_2023_987_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Functionality of technical working groups in enabling evidence-informed decision-making within Malawi's Ministry of Health: a cross-sectional qualitative study.技术工作组在促进马拉维卫生部循证决策方面的功能:一项横断面定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 6;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00987-7.
2
Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi.加强在卫生部门决策中使用研究证据的能力:肯尼亚和马拉维的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0511-5.
3
Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation.从非洲营养与健康循证决策(EVIDENT)中学到的经验教训:项目评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 31;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0413-6.
4
The role of National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in strengthening national vaccine decision-making: A comparative case study of Armenia, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda.国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAGs)在加强国家疫苗决策方面的作用:亚美尼亚、加纳、印度尼西亚、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和乌干达的比较案例研究。
Vaccine. 2018 Sep 5;36(37):5536-5543. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.063. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study.卫生系统中实施循证决策支持的障碍、促进因素及对后续步骤的看法:一项定性研究
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 5;9:179. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8.
6
How actors, processes, context and evidence influenced the development of Malawi's Health Sector Strategic Plan II.演员、过程、背景和证据如何影响马拉维卫生部门战略计划二的制定。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Nov;35(6):1571-1592. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3055. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
7
Data-informed decision-making for life-saving commodities investments in Malawi: A qualitative case study.马拉维救生用品投资的数据驱动决策:一项定性案例研究。
Malawi Med J. 2018 Jun;30(2):111-119. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v30i2.11.
8
Donor coordination to support universal health coverage in Malawi.在马拉维开展供者协调工作,以支持全民健康覆盖。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jan 23;39(Supplement_1):i118-i124. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad102.
9
Research evidence and policy: qualitative study in selected provinces in South Africa and Cameroon.研究证据与政策:在南非和喀麦隆部分省份开展的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 3;10:126. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0315-0.
10
A Qualitative Assessment of the Evidence Utilization for Health Policy-Making on the Basis of SUPPORT Tools in a Developing Country.基于支持工具在发展中国家进行卫生决策的证据利用情况的定性评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Aug 1;6(8):457-465. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.158.

引用本文的文献

1
How do food safety technical working groups within a One Health framework work? Experiences from Vietnam and Ethiopia.在“同一健康”框架下,食品安全技术工作组是如何开展工作的?来自越南和埃塞俄比亚的经验。
One Health Outlook. 2024 Sep 2;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42522-024-00110-y.
2
Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States: perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa.美国的蚊虫控制:对撒哈拉以南非洲国家的观点和教训。
Malar J. 2024 Jan 4;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04829-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Questions for future evidence-informed policy initiatives: insights from the evolution and aspirations of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups.未来基于证据的政策举措的问题:来自国家免疫技术咨询小组的演变与期望的见解
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 22;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00551-7.
2
Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi.加强在卫生部门决策中使用研究证据的能力:肯尼亚和马拉维的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0511-5.
3
Systematic Analysis of Evidence and Sound Expert Assessment: Two Enablers of Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Health.
证据的系统分析与合理的专家评估:健康领域基于证据决策的两大推动因素。
Glob Chall. 2018 Jun 28;2(9):1800022. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201800022. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Value and effectiveness of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study of global and national perspectives.国家免疫技术咨询小组在中低收入国家的价值和效果:全球和国家观点的定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 May 1;34(4):271-281. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz027.
5
Strengthening national vaccine decision-making: Assessing the impact of SIVAC Initiative support on national immunisation technical advisory group (NITAG) functionality in 77 low and middle-income countries.加强国家疫苗决策:评估 SIVAC 倡议支持对 77 个中低收入国家国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG)功能的影响。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 14;37(3):430-434. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.070. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
6
Measures assessing attributes of evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) competence among nurses: a systematic review protocol.评估护士循证决策(EIDM)能力属性的测量工具:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 3;7(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0849-8.
7
Towards a Systematic Understanding of How to Institutionally Design Scientific Advisory Committees: A Conceptual Framework and Introduction to a Special Journal Issue.迈向对科学咨询委员会制度设计方式的系统理解:概念框架及特刊介绍
Glob Chall. 2018 Sep 27;2(9):1800020. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201800020. eCollection 2018 Sep.
8
The role of National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in strengthening national vaccine decision-making: A comparative case study of Armenia, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda.国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAGs)在加强国家疫苗决策方面的作用:亚美尼亚、加纳、印度尼西亚、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和乌干达的比较案例研究。
Vaccine. 2018 Sep 5;36(37):5536-5543. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.063. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Existence and functionality of national immunisation technical advisory groups in Africa from 2010 to 2016.2010 年至 2016 年期间非洲国家免疫技术咨询小组的存在和功能。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(10):2447-2451. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1475815. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
The need for sustainability and alignment of future support for National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in low and middle-income countries.低、中收入国家对国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAGs)未来支持的可持续性和一致性的需求。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jun 3;14(6):1539-1541. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1444321. Epub 2018 Mar 26.