Emerson Amanda K, Hughes Dorothy
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Salina, Salina, KS.
Kans J Med. 2023 May 25;16(2):131-136. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.19524. eCollection 2023.
The purpose of this study was to determine referral initiation and completion disparities across primary care encounters at the Hope Family Care Center (HFCC) in Kansas City, MO, by payor type (primary insurance): private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay.
Data were collected and analyzed for all encounters (N = 4,235) over a 15-month period, including payor type, referral initiation and completion, and demographics. Referral initiation and completion were calculated by payor type and differences analyzed using Chi-square tests and t-tests. Logistic regression examined payor type association with referral initiation and completion, accounting for demographic variables.
Our analysis showed a meaningful difference in rate of referral to specialists by payor type. The Medicaid encounter referral initiation rate was higher than rates for all other payor types (7.4% vs. 5.0%), and self-pay encounters' referral initiation rate was lower than rates for all other payor types (3.8% vs. 6.4%). Using logistic regression, Medicaid encounters had 1.4 greater odds, and self-pay encounters 0.7 greater odds, of initiating a referral compared to private insurance encounters. There was no difference in referral completion by payor type or demographic category.
Equal referral completion rates across payor types suggested HFCC may have had well-established referral resources for patients. Higher referral initiation rates for Medicaid and lower for self-pay may suggest that insurance coverage offered financial confidence when seeking specialist care. Higher odds of Medicaid encounters initiating a referral could imply greater health needs among Medicaid patients.
本研究的目的是确定密苏里州堪萨斯城希望家庭护理中心(HFCC)按付款人类型(主要保险)划分的初级保健会诊中转诊起始和完成情况的差异,付款人类型包括:私人保险、医疗补助、医疗保险和自费。
收集并分析了15个月期间所有会诊(N = 4235)的数据,包括付款人类型、转诊起始和完成情况以及人口统计学数据。按付款人类型计算转诊起始和完成情况,并使用卡方检验和t检验分析差异。逻辑回归分析了付款人类型与转诊起始和完成情况的关联,并考虑了人口统计学变量。
我们的分析表明,不同付款人类型的专科转诊率存在显著差异。医疗补助会诊的转诊起始率高于所有其他付款人类型(7.4%对5.0%),自费会诊的转诊起始率低于所有其他付款人类型(3.8%对6.4%)。通过逻辑回归分析,与私人保险会诊相比,医疗补助会诊发起转诊的可能性高1.4倍,自费会诊高0.7倍。不同付款人类型或人口统计学类别在转诊完成方面没有差异。
不同付款人类型的转诊完成率相同,这表明HFCC可能为患者建立了完善的转诊资源。医疗补助的转诊起始率较高,自费的转诊起始率较低,这可能表明保险覆盖在寻求专科护理时提供了经济信心。医疗补助会诊发起转诊的可能性较高,这可能意味着医疗补助患者的健康需求更大。