Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY, 14215, USA.
AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Adv Ther. 2023 Aug;40(8):3465-3477. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02539-5. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is highly effective in curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in people who inject drugs (PWID). Previous studies showed declining persistence to DAA therapy over the course of treatment. This study compares real-world medication persistence to prescription refills for 8- versus 12-week DAA in treatment-naïve PWID with chronic HCV with compensated cirrhosis or without cirrhosis.
Symphony Health's claims database was used to collect data from patients with chronic HCV aged ≥ 12 years who were prescribed 8- or 12-week DAA therapy between August 2017 and November 2020 and had a diagnosis of addicted drug use within 6 months prior to index date. Eligible patients had medical/pharmacy claims in the 6 months before and 3 months after the first index medication fill date (i.e., index date). Patients completing all refills (8-week = 1 refill, 12-week = 2 refills) were deemed persistent. The percentage of persistent patients in each group, and at each refill step, was determined; outcomes were also assessed in a subgroup of Medicaid-insured patients.
This study assessed 7203 PWID with chronic HCV (8-week, 4002; 12-week, 3201). Patients prescribed 8-week DAA treatment were younger (42.9 ± 12.4 vs 47.5 ± 13.2, P < 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (P < 0.001). Patients receiving 8- versus 12-week DAA had greater refill persistence (87.9% vs 64.4%, P < 0.001). Similar percentages of patients missed their first refill (8-week, 12.1% vs 12-week, 10.8%); nearly 25% of patients receiving 12-week DAA missed their second refill. After baseline characteristics were controlled, patients prescribed 8- versus 12-week DAA were more likely to be persistent (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 4.3 [3.8, 5.0]). Findings in the Medicaid-insured subgroup were consistent.
Patients prescribed 8- vs 12-week DAA therapy had significantly greater prescription refill persistence. Most nonpersistence was due to missed second refills, highlighting the potential benefit of shorter treatment durations in this population.
直接作用抗病毒 (DAA) 疗法在治疗注射吸毒者 (PWID) 的丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 感染方面非常有效。先前的研究表明,在治疗过程中,DAA 治疗的持续时间会逐渐减少。本研究比较了初治慢性 HCV 合并代偿性肝硬化或无肝硬化的 PWID 接受 8 周和 12 周 DAA 治疗的真实世界药物持续时间与处方续方。
利用 Symphony Health 的理赔数据库,收集 2017 年 8 月至 2020 年 11 月期间接受 8 周或 12 周 DAA 治疗且在指数日期前 6 个月内有药物滥用诊断的年龄≥12 岁的慢性 HCV 患者的数据。符合条件的患者在首次指数药物使用日期前 6 个月和之后 3 个月内有医疗/药房理赔。患者完成所有续方(8 周=1 次续方,12 周=2 次续方)被认为是持续治疗。确定每组和每个续方步骤中持续治疗的患者比例;还在 Medicaid 保险患者亚组中评估了结果。
本研究评估了 7203 名慢性 HCV 合并 PWID(8 周,4002 例;12 周,3201 例)。接受 8 周 DAA 治疗的患者更年轻(42.9±12.4 岁 vs 47.5±13.2 岁,P<0.001)且合并症更少(P<0.001)。接受 8 周与 12 周 DAA 治疗的患者的续方持续率更高(87.9% vs 64.4%,P<0.001)。错过首次续方的患者比例相似(8 周,12.1% vs 12 周,10.8%);接受 12 周 DAA 治疗的近 25%的患者错过了第二次续方。在控制了基线特征后,接受 8 周与 12 周 DAA 治疗的患者更有可能持续治疗(优势比[95%置信区间] 4.3[3.8, 5.0])。在 Medicaid 保险患者亚组中发现的结果一致。
与接受 12 周 DAA 治疗的患者相比,接受 8 周 DAA 治疗的患者处方续方持续率显著更高。大多数非持续性治疗是由于错过了第二次续方,这突显了在该人群中缩短治疗持续时间的潜在益处。