Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Forckenbeckstrasse 6, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
BMC Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12896-023-00782-w.
Large-scale transient expression of recombinant proteins in plants is increasingly used and requires the multi-liter cultivation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformed with an expression vector, which is often cloned in Escherichia coli first. Depending on the promoter, unintentional activity can occur in both bacteria, which could pose a safety risk to the environment and operators if the protein is toxic. To assess the risk associated with transient expression, we first tested expression vectors containing the CaMV35S promoter known to be active in plants and bacteria, along with controls to measure the accumulation of the corresponding recombinant proteins. We found that, in both bacteria, even the stable model protein DsRed accumulated at levels near the detection limit of the sandwich ELISA (3.8 µg L). Higher levels were detected in short cultivations (< 12 h) but never exceeded 10 µg L. We determined the abundance of A. tumefaciens throughout the process, including infiltration. We detected few bacteria in the clarified extract and found none after blanching. Finally, we combined protein accumulation and bacterial abundance data with the known effects of toxic proteins to estimate critical exposures for operators. We found that unintended toxin production in bacteria is negligible. Furthermore, the intravenous uptake of multiple milliliters of fermentation broth or infiltration suspension would be required to reach acute toxicity even when handling the most toxic products (LD ~ 1 ng kg). The unintentional uptake of such quantities is unlikely and we therefore regard transient expression as safe in terms of the bacterial handling procedure.
大规模瞬时表达重组蛋白在植物中越来越多地被使用,需要对携带表达载体的农杆菌进行多升培养,该载体通常首先在大肠杆菌中进行克隆。根据启动子的不同,在细菌中都会发生非预期的活性,如果该蛋白有毒,可能会对环境和操作人员构成安全风险。为了评估瞬时表达相关的风险,我们首先测试了含有 CaMV35S 启动子的表达载体,该启动子在植物和细菌中均具有活性,同时还设置了对照来测量相应重组蛋白的积累。我们发现,即使是稳定的模型蛋白 DsRed,在两种细菌中都积累到接近夹心 ELISA(3.8 µg L)检测限的水平。在短培养(<12 h)中检测到更高的水平,但从未超过 10 µg L。我们在整个过程中包括浸润阶段都测定了农杆菌的丰度。在澄清提取物中检测到的细菌很少,经过烫漂后则检测不到。最后,我们将蛋白积累和细菌丰度数据与已知毒性蛋白的效应相结合,估算了对操作人员的关键暴露量。我们发现,细菌中意外产生毒素的情况可以忽略不计。此外,即使在处理最有毒的产品(LD 50 ~ 1 ng kg)时,也需要静脉内摄入数毫升发酵液或浸润悬浮液才能达到急性毒性。无意摄入如此大量的物质不太可能发生,因此我们认为,就细菌处理过程而言,瞬时表达是安全的。