Suppr超能文献

扩展的童年不良经历(ACEs)与成人使用大麻:一项潜在类别分析。

Expanded Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Adult Cannabis Use: A Latent Class Analysis.

作者信息

Smith Douglas C, Garthe Rachel C, Lee Alex, Kim Shongha, Thebaud Magdelene, Kovacevic Lucy

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Cannabis. 2023 Feb 7;6(1):1-9. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023.01.005. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

In addition to traditionally assessed abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) include adversities like racial discrimination, community violence, and bullying. Prior research established associations between the original ACEs and substance use, but few used Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to examine patterns of ACEs. Examining patterns of ACEs may yield additional insights beyond cumulative risk studies focusing only on the number of different ACEs experiences. Therefore, we identified associations between latent classes of ACEs and cannabis use. Studies on ACES rarely examine cannabis use outcomes, which is important as cannabis remains one of the most commonly used substances and is associated with negative effects on health. Yet it is still unclear how ACEs influence cannabis use. Participants were adults in Illinois (n = 712) recruited through Qualtrics' online quota-sampling method. They completed measures of 14 ACEs, past 30-day and lifetime cannabis use, medical cannabis use (DFACQ) and probable cannabis use disorders (CUDIT-R-SF). Latent class analyses were performed using ACEs. We identified four classes, labeled: , and . The largest effect sizes (p<.05) were observed for those in the class, who had elevated risks for lifetime (OR =6.2), 30-day (OR = 5.05), and medicinal cannabis use (OR = 17.9) relative to those in the class. Those in the and classes also had increased odds (p<.05) for lifetime (OR =2.44/OR=2.82), 30-day (OR = 4.88/OR= 2.53), and medicinal cannabis use (OR = 2.59/OR =1.67(ns)) relative to those in the class. However, no class with elevated ACEs had higher odds for CUD relative to the class. Additional research could further disentangle these findings using extensive measures of CUD. Additionally, as participants in the class had higher odds of medicinal cannabis use, future research could carefully study their consumption patterns.

摘要

除了传统评估的虐待、忽视和家庭功能失调外,童年不良经历(ACEs)还包括种族歧视、社区暴力和欺凌等逆境。先前的研究确定了最初的ACEs与物质使用之间的关联,但很少有人使用潜在类别分析(LCA)来研究ACEs的模式。研究ACEs的模式可能会产生超出仅关注不同ACEs经历数量的累积风险研究的额外见解。因此,我们确定了ACEs潜在类别与大麻使用之间的关联。关于ACEs的研究很少考察大麻使用结果,这很重要,因为大麻仍然是最常用的物质之一,并且与对健康的负面影响有关。然而,目前尚不清楚ACEs如何影响大麻使用。参与者是通过Qualtrics的在线配额抽样方法招募的伊利诺伊州成年人(n = 712)。他们完成了14种ACEs、过去30天和终生大麻使用、医用大麻使用(DFACQ)和可能的大麻使用障碍(CUDIT-R-SF)的测量。使用ACEs进行潜在类别分析。我们确定了四个类别,分别标记为: 、 和 。相对于 类别中的人, 类别中的人在终生(OR = 6.2)、30天(OR = 5.05)和医用大麻使用(OR = 17.9)方面风险升高,观察到的效应大小最大(p <.05)。相对于 类别中的人, 类别和 类别中的人在终生(OR = 2.44/OR = 2.82)、30天(OR = 4.88/OR = 2.53)和医用大麻使用(OR = 2.59/OR = 1.67(无显著性差异))方面的几率也增加(p <.05)。然而,与 类别相比,ACEs升高的类别中CUD的几率没有更高。进一步的研究可以使用广泛的CUD测量方法进一步理清这些发现。此外,由于 类别中的参与者医用大麻使用的几率更高,未来的研究可以仔细研究他们的消费模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbf/10212256/6c6d6a0dc011/rsmj-6-1-50-fig001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验