Meyer A A, Ahlquist R E, Trunkey D D
Am J Surg. 1986 Jul;152(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90132-7.
Series of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms from a municipal teaching hospital and from a group of private surgeons practicing at four community hospitals were compared for hemodynamic status and time to operation, as well as mortality. The overall mortality rate was 61 percent for the municipal hospital series and 32 percent for the community hospital series, which was significantly different (p = 0.003). The municipal hospital series had a significantly greater number of patients in shock before operation, as well as a greater number of patients transported directly to the operating room. The community hospital series had a significantly greater number of patients with a more than 6 hour delay in diagnosis and delays in surgical exploration. When those patients in shock who were brought directly to the operating room were compared, there was no statistical difference between the two series. Further reviews of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms should attempt to identify groups of patients by their hemodynamic status when evaluating treatment.
对一家市级教学医院以及在四家社区医院执业的一组私人外科医生所诊治的一系列腹主动脉瘤破裂病例进行了比较,比较内容包括血流动力学状态、手术时间以及死亡率。市级医院系列的总体死亡率为61%,社区医院系列为32%,两者存在显著差异(p = 0.003)。市级医院系列术前处于休克状态的患者数量显著更多,直接被送往手术室的患者数量也更多。社区医院系列诊断延迟超过6小时以及手术探查延迟的患者数量显著更多。当对直接被送往手术室的休克患者进行比较时,两个系列之间没有统计学差异。在评估治疗时,对腹主动脉瘤破裂病例的进一步回顾应尝试根据血流动力学状态对患者群体进行识别。