Suppr超能文献

在适合使用顺铂的老年患者(>65岁)中,采用NEPA(奈妥吡坦/帕洛诺司琼)的地塞米松减量方案预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项3期研究的亚分析。

Dexamethasone-sparing regimens with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in older patients (>65 years) fit for cisplatin: A sub-analysis from a phase 3 study.

作者信息

Celio Luigi, Bartsch Rupert, Aapro Matti

机构信息

Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale del Garda, Desenzano del Garda, Italy.

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Jul;14(6):101537. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101537. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We recently demonstrated the non-inferiority of two dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens with an oral fixed-combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) versus the guideline-recommended DEX use for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Since prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is critical in older patients, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of the DEX-sparing regimens in this subset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemo-naive patients aged >65 years treated with high-dose cisplatin (≥70 mg/m) were eligible. Patients received NEPA and DEX on day 1 and were randomized to receive either (1) no further DEX (DEX1), (2) oral low-dose DEX (4 mg) on days 2-3 (DEX3), or (3) the guideline-recommended standard DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2-4 (DEX4). The primary efficacy endpoint of the parent study was complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1-5). No significant nausea (NSN; none or mild nausea) and the proportion of patients reporting no impact on daily life (NIDL) which was evaluated by the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire on day 6 (overall combined score > 108), were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among the 228 patients in the parent study, 107 were > 65 years. Similar CR rates [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were observed in patients over 65 years across treatment groups [DEX1: 75% (59.7-86.8%); DEX3: 80.6% (62.5-92.6%); DEX4: 75% (56.6-88.5%)] as well as versus the total study population. NSN rates were also similar in the older-patients across treatment groups (p = 0.480) but were higher compared with the total population. Similar rates of NIDL (95% CI) were reported in the older-patient subset across treatment groups [DEX1: 61.5% (44.6-76.6%); DEX3: 64.3% (44.1-81.4%); DEX4: 62.1% (42.3-79.3%); p = 1.0] during the overall phase, as well as versus total population. A similar proportion of older patients across treatment groups experienced DEX-related side effects.

DISCUSSION

This analysis shows that older-patients who are fit for cisplatin benefit from a simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX with neither loss in antiemetic efficacy nor the adverse impact on patient daily functioning. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04201769) on 17/12/2019 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

引言

我们最近证明了两种地塞米松(DEX)减量方案与口服固定剂量组合的奈妥匹坦和帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)相比,在预防顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐方面不劣于指南推荐使用的DEX。由于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐对老年患者至关重要,我们回顾性评估了DEX减量方案在该亚组中的疗效。

材料与方法

年龄>65岁、接受高剂量顺铂(≥70mg/m)治疗的初治患者符合条件。患者在第1天接受NEPA和DEX,并随机分为三组:(1)不再接受DEX(DEX1);(2)在第2 - 3天口服低剂量DEX(4mg)(DEX3);(3)在第2 - 4天接受指南推荐的标准DEX(每日两次,每次4mg)(DEX4)。原研究的主要疗效终点是整个阶段(第1 - 5天)的完全缓解(CR;无呕吐且未使用解救药物)。次要终点是无明显恶心(NSN;无或轻度恶心)以及通过第6天的功能生活指数 - 呕吐问卷评估的报告对日常生活无影响(NIDL)的患者比例(总综合评分>108)。

结果

在原研究的228例患者中,107例年龄>65岁。各治疗组中65岁以上患者的CR率[95%置信区间(CI)]相似[DEX1:75%(59.7 - 86.8%);DEX3:80.6%(62.5 - 92.6%);DEX4:75%(56.6 - 88.5%)],与整个研究人群相比也相似。各治疗组老年患者的NSN率也相似(p = 0.480),但与总人群相比更高。各治疗组老年患者亚组在整个阶段的NIDL率(95%CI)相似[DEX1:61.5%(44.6 - 76.6%);DEX3:64.3%(44.1 - 81.4%);DEX4:62.1%(42.3 - 79.3%);p = 1.0],与总人群相比也相似。各治疗组中经历DEX相关副作用的老年患者比例相似。

讨论

该分析表明,适合接受顺铂治疗的老年患者受益于NEPA加单剂量DEX的简化方案,在止吐疗效上没有损失,对患者日常功能也没有不利影响。该研究于2019年12月17日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符NCT04201769)(回顾性注册)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验