Sun Ching-Fang, Correll Christoph U, Trestman Robert L, Lin Yezhe, Xie Hui, Hankey Maria Stack, Uymatiao Raymond Paglinawan, Patel Riya T, Metsutnan Vemmy L, McDaid Erin Corinne, Saha Atreyi, Kuo Chin, Lewis Paula, Bhatt Shyam H, Lipphard Lauren Elizabeth, Kablinger Anita S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;84:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 25.
To identify potential barriers to care, this study examined the general psychiatry outpatient new appointment availability in the US, including in-person and telepsychiatry appointments, comparing results between insurance types (Medicaid vs. private insurance), states, and urbanization levels.
This mystery shopper study investigated 5 US states selected according to Mental Health America Adult Ranking and geography to represent the US mental health care system. Clinics across five selected states were stratified sampled by county urbanization levels. Calls were made during 05/2022-07/2022. Collected data included contact information accuracy, appointment availability, wait time (days), and related information.
Altogether, 948 psychiatrists were sampled in New York, California, North Dakota, Virginia, and Wyoming. Overall contact information accuracy averaged 85.3%. Altogether, 18.5% of psychiatrists were available to see new patients with a significantly longer wait time for in-person than telepsychiatry appointments (median = 67.0 days vs median = 43.0 days, p < 0.01). The most frequent reason for unavailability was provider not taking new patients (53.9%). Mental health resources were unevenly distributed, favoring urban areas.
Psychiatric care has been severely restricted in the US with low accessibility and long wait times. Transitioning to telepsychiatry represents a potential solution for rural disparities in access.
为了确定护理的潜在障碍,本研究调查了美国普通精神科门诊新预约的可及性,包括面对面预约和远程精神病学预约,并比较了不同保险类型(医疗补助与私人保险)、州以及城市化水平之间的结果。
这项神秘顾客研究根据美国心理健康协会成人排名和地理位置选择了美国5个州,以代表美国的精神卫生保健系统。根据县城市化水平对所选5个州的诊所进行分层抽样。在2022年5月至2022年7月期间进行电话调查。收集的数据包括联系信息准确性、预约可及性、等待时间(天数)及相关信息。
总共在纽约、加利福尼亚、北达科他州、弗吉尼亚州和怀俄明州抽取了948名精神科医生。总体联系信息准确性平均为85.3%。共有18.5%的精神科医生可接待新患者,面对面预约的等待时间明显长于远程精神病学预约(中位数=67.0天对中位数=43.0天,p<0.01)。无法提供服务的最常见原因是医生不接收新患者(53.9%)。精神卫生资源分布不均,城市地区更具优势。
美国的精神科护理受到严重限制,可及性低且等待时间长。向远程精神病学过渡是解决农村地区可及性差异的一个潜在办法。