Liu Li-Ting, Liu Huai, Huang Ying, Yang Jin-Hao, Xie Si-Yi, Li Yuan-Yuan, Guo Shan-Shan, Qi Bin, Li Xiao-Yun, Chen Dong-Ping, Jin Feng, Sun Xue-Song, Yang Zhen-Chong, Liu Sai-Lan, Luo Dong-Hua, Li Ji-Bin, Liu Qing, Wang Pan, Guo Ling, Mo Hao-Yuan, Qiu Fang, Yang Qi, Liang Yu-Jing, Jia Guo-Dong, Wen Dong-Xiang, Yan Jin-Jie, Zhao Chong, Chen Qiu-Yan, Sun Rui, Tang Lin-Quan, Mai Hai-Qiang
Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Hunan Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):798-810. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00232-2. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of treatment being unsuccessful despite the current practice of using a concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-fluorouracil regimen. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine with cisplatin-fluorouracil in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial at four cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with untreated, non-keratinising, stage T1-4 N2-3 M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by either gemcitabine (1 g/m intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil (4 g/m in continuous intravenous infusion for 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 4 weeks, for three cycles. Randomisation was done using a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by treatment centre and nodal category. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of chemoradiotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03321539, and patients are currently under follow-up.
From Oct 30, 2017, to July 9, 2020, 240 patients (median age 44 years [IQR 36-52]; 175 [73%] male and 65 [27%] female) were randomly assigned to the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (n=120) or cisplatin-gemcitabine group (n=120). As of data cutoff (Dec 25, 2022), median follow-up was 40 months (IQR 32-48). 3-year progression-free survival was 83·9% (95% CI 75·9-89·4; 19 disease progressions and 11 deaths) in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 71·5% (62·5-78·7; 34 disease progressions and seven deaths) in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (stratified hazard ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·32-0·93]; log rank p=0·023). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events that occurred during treatment were leukopenia (61 [52%] of 117 in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group vs 34 [29%] of 116 in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group; p=0·00039), neutropenia (37 [32%] vs 19 [16%]; p=0·010), and mucositis (27 [23%] vs 32 [28%]; p=0·43). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse event (occurring from 3 months after completion of radiotherapy) was auditory or hearing loss (six [5%] vs ten [9%]). One (1%) patient in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group died due to treatment-related complications (septic shock caused by neutropenic infection). No patients in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group had treatment-related deaths.
Our findings suggest that concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine could be used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, although long-term follow-up is required to confirm the optimal therapeutic ratio.
National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholar, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, the Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Program of Guangdong Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
尽管目前采用顺铂-氟尿嘧啶同步辅助化疗方案,但N2-3期鼻咽癌患者治疗失败风险仍很高。我们旨在比较顺铂-吉西他滨与顺铂-氟尿嘧啶同步辅助化疗方案治疗N2-3期鼻咽癌的疗效和安全性。
我们在中国四个癌症中心开展了一项开放标签、随机、对照、3期试验。符合条件的患者年龄为18-65岁,患有未经治疗的非角化型、T1-4N2-3M0期鼻咽癌,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为0-1,骨髓、肝肾功能良好。符合条件的患者按1:1随机分配,在调强放疗的第1、22和43天接受顺铂(100mg/m²静脉注射),随后每3周接受一次吉西他滨(第1天和第8天1g/m²静脉注射)和顺铂(第1天80mg/m²静脉注射4小时),或每4周接受一次氟尿嘧啶(4g/m²持续静脉输注96小时)和顺铂(第1天80mg/m²静脉注射4小时),共三个周期。采用计算机生成的随机数字编码进行随机分组,组块大小为6,按治疗中心和淋巴结类别分层。主要终点是意向性治疗人群(即所有随机分配接受治疗的患者)的3年无进展生存期。对所有接受至少一剂放化疗的参与者进行安全性评估。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03321539,目前患者正在随访中。
2017年10月30日至2020年7月9日,240例患者(中位年龄44岁[四分位间距36-52岁];男性175例[73%],女性65例[27%])被随机分配至顺铂-氟尿嘧啶组(n=120)或顺铂-吉西他滨组(n=120)。截至数据截止日期(2022年12月25日),中位随访时间为40个月(四分位间距32-48个月)。顺铂-吉西他滨组的3年无进展生存率为83.9%(95%CI75.9-89.4;19例疾病进展,11例死亡),顺铂-氟尿嘧啶组为71.5%(62.5-78.7;34例疾病进展,7例死亡)(分层风险比0.54[95%CI0.32-0.93];log秩检验p=0.023)。治疗期间发生的最常见3级或更严重不良事件为白细胞减少(顺铂-吉西他滨组117例中的61例[52%],顺铂-氟尿嘧啶组116例中的34例[29%];p=0.00039)、中性粒细胞减少(37例[32%]对19例[16%];p=0.010)和黏膜炎(27例[23%]对32例[28%];p=0.43)。最常见的3级或更严重晚期不良事件(放疗完成后3个月出现)为听觉或听力丧失(6例[5%]对10例[9%])。顺铂-吉西他滨组有1例(1%)患者因治疗相关并发症(中性粒细胞减少感染导致的感染性休克)死亡。顺铂-氟尿嘧啶组无患者死于治疗相关原因。
我们的研究结果表明,顺铂-吉西他滨同步辅助化疗可作为N2-3期鼻咽癌患者的辅助治疗方法,不过仍需长期随访以确定最佳治疗效益比。
中国国家重点研发计划、国家自然科学基金、广东省基础与应用基础研究重大项目、广州市科技计划项目、中山大学临床研究5010计划、上海市高水平地方高校创新研究团队、广东省杰出青年科学基金、广东省自然科学基金、博士后创新人才支持计划、广州市珠江科技新星计划、广东省科技计划项目、中山大学中青年教师培育计划、广东省农村科技特派员计划以及中央高校基本科研业务费。