Sekmek Serhat, Oguz Aysel, Karakurt Eryilmaz Melek, Araz Murat, Biter Sedat, Kıdı Mehmet Mutlu, Bayram Ertugrul, Erdat Efe Cem, Yasar Arzu, Colak Rumeysa, Yilmaz Mesut, Bakir Kahveci Gizem, Divriklioglu Didem, Chalabiyev Elvin, Aksoy Sercan, Ozsan Celebi Sema Nur, Kosku Hakan, Yılmaz Mesut, Hacibekiroglu Ilhan, Temizyurek Haydar, Canaslan Kubra, Turhan Gorkem, Kadıoglu Ahmet, Jeral Seda, Atak Mehmetcan, Atacan Huseyin, Ozbay Anil, Atasever Tugay, Seyyar Mustafa, Can Sanci Pervin, Koylu Bahadir, Majidova Nargiz, Arpaci Erkan, Akinci Muhammed Bulent, Uncu Dogan, Ucar Gokhan
Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan Unıversıty, 42090 Konya, Turkey.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4189. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124189.
In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the efficacy, survival, and toxicity results of induction (IC) or adjuvant (AC) treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). A total of 405 patients from 22 different centres in Turkey, belonging to the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG), was included. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were safety and toxicity. : The median age of the patients included in the study was 49 (18.2-91.5) years. In total, 298 (73.6%) of the patients were male. Of the 405 patients, 258 (63.7%) received IC and 147 (36.3%) received AC treatment. When OS and PFS analyses were performed in terms of age, gender, T and N stages, pathological features, and treatments received, no effect of any variable on prognosis was observed. For the overall group, the median estimated OS was 137.3 months (the Kaplan-Meier statistical method could not reach the 95% confidence interval [CI]). For the IC group, the median estimated survival was 137.3 months (95% CI: 111.4-163.3), whereas the Kaplan-Meier statistical method could not estimate survival for the AC group. No statistically significant difference was observed between IC and AC groups in terms of OS ( = 0.209) or PFS ( = 0.248). Grade 3-4 side effects were observed in 12% of patients in the IC group and 29.9% of patients in the AC group. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 5 patients (1.9%) in the IC group and 18 patients (12.2%) in the AC group. No difference in OS or PFS was observed between AC and IC treatments. More grade 3-4 side effects were observed in the AC-treated group and early discontinuation rate was higher.
在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在比较诱导化疗(IC)或辅助化疗(AC)联合放化疗(CRT)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)的疗效、生存率和毒性结果。纳入了来自土耳其22个不同中心、属于土耳其肿瘤学组(TOG)的405例患者。主要终点为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点为安全性和毒性。研究纳入患者的中位年龄为49(18.2 - 91.5)岁。总共有298例(73.6%)患者为男性。在405例患者中,258例(63.7%)接受了IC治疗,147例(36.3%)接受了AC治疗。当根据年龄、性别、T和N分期、病理特征以及所接受的治疗进行OS和PFS分析时,未观察到任何变量对预后有影响。对于整个组,中位估计OS为137.3个月(Kaplan - Meier统计方法未达到95%置信区间[CI])。对于IC组,中位估计生存期为137.3个月(95% CI:111.4 - 163.3),而Kaplan - Meier统计方法无法估计AC组的生存期。IC组和AC组在OS( = 0.209)或PFS( = 0.248)方面未观察到统计学显著差异。IC组12%的患者和AC组29.9%的患者出现3 - 4级副作用。IC组有5例患者(1.9%)因毒性而停止治疗,AC组有18例患者(12.2%)因毒性而停止治疗。AC治疗和IC治疗在OS或PFS方面未观察到差异。AC治疗组观察到更多的3 - 4级副作用,且早期停药率更高。