Peters Anthony E, Nguyen Maggie, Green Jennifer B, Pearson Ewan R, Buse John, Sourij Harald, Hernandez Adrian F, Sattar Naveed, Holman Rury R, Mentz Robert J, Shah Svati H
medRxiv. 2023 May 16:2023.05.16.23288273. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.16.23288273.
BACKGROUND: Ejection fraction (EF) is a key component of heart failure (HF) classification, including the increasingly codified HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) category. However, the biologic basis of HFmrEF as an entity distinct from HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) and reduced EF (HFrEF) has not been well characterized. METHODS: The EXSCEL trial randomized participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to once-weekly exenatide (EQW) vs. placebo. For this study, profiling of ∼5000 proteins using the SomaLogic SomaScan platform was performed in baseline and 12-month serum samples from N=1199 participants with prevalent HF at baseline. Principal component analysis (PCA) and ANOVA (FDR p<0.1) were used to determine differences in proteins between three EF groups, as previously curated in EXSCEL (EF>55% [HFpEF], EF 40-55% [HFmrEF], EF<40% [HFrEF]). Cox proportional hazards was used to assess association between baseline levels of significant proteins, and changes in protein level between baseline and 12-month, with time-to-HF hospitalization. Mixed models were used to assess whether significant proteins changed differentially with exenatide vs. placebo therapy. RESULTS: Of N=1199 EXSCEL participants with prevalent HF, 284 (24%), 704 (59%) and 211 (18%) had HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively. Eight PCA protein factors and 221 individual proteins within these factors differed significantly across the three EF groups. Levels of the majority of proteins (83%) demonstrated concordance between HFmrEF and HFpEF, but higher levels in HFrEF, predominated by the domain of extracellular matrix regulation, COL28A1 and tenascin C [TNC]; p<0.0001. Concordance between HFmrEF and HFrEF was observed in a minority of proteins (1%) including MMP-9 (p<0.0001). Biologic pathways of epithelial mesenchymal transition, ECM receptor interaction, complement and coagulation cascades, and cytokine receptor interaction demonstrated enrichment among proteins with the dominant pattern, HFmrEF-HFpEF concordance. Baseline levels of 208 (94%) of the 221 proteins were associated with time-to-incident HF hospitalization including domains of extracellular matrix (COL28A1, TNC), angiogenesis (ANG2, VEGFa, VEGFd), myocyte stretch (NT-proBNP), and renal function (cystatin-C). Change in levels of 10 of the 221 proteins from baseline to 12 months (including increase in TNC) predicted incident HF hospitalization (p<0.05). Levels of 30 of the 221 significant proteins (including TNC, NT-proBNP, ANG2) were reduced differentially by EQW compared with placebo (interaction p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this HF substudy of a large clinical trial of people with T2DM, we found that serum levels of most proteins across multiple biologic domains were similar between HFmrEF and HFpEF. HFmrEF may be more biologically similar to HFpEF than HFrEF, and specific related biomarkers may offer unique data on prognosis and pharmacotherapy modification with variability by EF.
背景:射血分数(EF)是心力衰竭(HF)分类的关键组成部分,包括日益规范的射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)类别。然而,HFmrEF作为一种不同于射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的实体,其生物学基础尚未得到充分表征。 方法:EXSCEL试验将2型糖尿病(T2DM)参与者随机分为每周一次的艾塞那肽(EQW)组和安慰剂组。在本研究中,使用SomaLogic SomaScan平台对约5000种蛋白质进行分析,分析对象为来自N = 1199名基线时患有HF的参与者的基线和12个月血清样本。主成分分析(PCA)和方差分析(FDR p<0.1)用于确定三个EF组之间蛋白质的差异,如EXSCEL中先前分类的(EF>55%[HFpEF],EF 40 - 55%[HFmrEF],EF<40%[HFrEF])。Cox比例风险模型用于评估显著蛋白质的基线水平以及基线和12个月之间蛋白质水平的变化与HF住院时间之间的关联。混合模型用于评估显著蛋白质在艾塞那肽与安慰剂治疗之间是否有差异变化。 结果:在N = 1199名患有HF的EXSCEL参与者中,分别有284名(24%)、704名(59%)和211名(18%)患有HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF。八个PCA蛋白质因子以及这些因子中的221种个体蛋白质在三个EF组之间存在显著差异。大多数蛋白质(83%)的水平在HFmrEF和HFpEF之间表现出一致性,但在HFrEF中水平更高,主要由细胞外基质调节、COL28A1和腱生蛋白C[TNC]领域主导;p<0.0001。在少数蛋白质(1%)中观察到HFmrEF和HFrEF之间的一致性,包括基质金属蛋白酶 - 9(MMP - 9)(p<0.0001)。上皮 - 间质转化、ECM受体相互作用、补体和凝血级联以及细胞因子受体相互作用的生物学途径在具有主导模式(HFmrEF - HFpEF一致性)的蛋白质中表现出富集。221种蛋白质中的208种(94%)的基线水平与HF住院事件发生时间相关,包括细胞外基质(COL28A1、TNC)、血管生成(ANG2、VEGFa、VEGFd)、心肌细胞拉伸(NT - proBNP)和肾功能(胱抑素 - C)领域。221种蛋白质中有10种从基线到12个月的水平变化(包括TNC增加)预测了HF住院事件(p<0.05)。与安慰剂相比,EQW使221种显著蛋白质中的30种(包括TNC、NT - proBNP、ANG2)水平有差异降低(交互作用p<0.0001)。 结论:在这项针对T2DM患者的大型临床试验的HF子研究中,我们发现多个生物学领域中大多数蛋白质的血清水平在HFmrEF和HFpEF之间相似。与HFrEF相比,HFmrEF在生物学上可能与HFpEF更相似,并且特定的相关生物标志物可能提供关于预后和根据EF变异性进行药物治疗调整的独特数据。
JACC Heart Fail. 2025-3