Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231963. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31963.
In recent years, significant progress has been made in the pharmacologic treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but there is still insufficient evidence for drug therapy for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).
To compare the outcomes associated with different drug combinations for the treatment of HFpEF and HFmrEF.
A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted for studies published from inception to October 9, 2021.
Randomized clinical trials on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), β-blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.
Data extraction and bias assessment were independently performed by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. All data for 3 outcomes were pooled with a fixed-effect model.
The main outcomes were first hospitalization for HF, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were evaluated using a bayesian network meta-analysis model.
In this analysis, 19 randomized clinical trials, including 20 633 patients with HF and an ejection fraction of 40% or more, without a remarkable risk of bias were included. Compared with placebo, no treatments were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause death or cardiovascular death. SGLT2 inhibitors, ARNIs, and MRAs were associated with a significant decrease in the risk of HF hospitalization compared with placebo (SGLT2 inhibitors: HR, 0.71 [95% CrI, 0.60-0.83]; ARNIs: HR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.61-0.95]; MRAs: HR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.69-0.99]), and SGLT2 inhibitors were the optimal drug class in terms of reducing the risk for HF admission. Sensitivity analysis results demonstrated a progressive decrease in the risk of HF admission and an advance in mean rank associated with the increasing use of drug classes.
The findings of this study suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors were the optimal drug class for HFpEF and HFmrEF, consistent with the most recent guideline recommendation. The incremental use of combinations of SGLT2 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and β-blockers may be associated with accumulative benefits in HF hospitalization rather than all-cause death among patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF.
近年来,射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的药物治疗取得了重大进展,但射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)的药物治疗仍缺乏充分证据。
比较不同药物联合治疗 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 的结局。
从研究开始到 2021 年 10 月 9 日,对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)数据库进行了搜索。
对 ACE 抑制剂、ARB、ARNI、MRA、β-受体阻滞剂和 SGLT2 抑制剂用于 HFpEF 或 HFmrEF 患者的随机临床试验。
两名评审员按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南独立进行数据提取和偏倚评估。所有 3 项结局的数据均采用固定效应模型进行汇总。
主要结局为首次心力衰竭住院、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析模型评估风险比(HR)和 95%可信区间(CrI)。
在这项分析中,包括了 19 项随机临床试验,共纳入了 20633 名射血分数为 40%或更高、无显著偏倚风险的心力衰竭患者。与安慰剂相比,没有治疗方法与全因死亡或心血管死亡风险的显著降低相关。SGLT2 抑制剂、ARNI 和 MRA 与心力衰竭住院风险的降低显著相关(SGLT2 抑制剂:HR,0.71[95%CrI,0.60-0.83];ARNI:HR,0.76[95%CrI,0.61-0.95];MRA:HR,0.83[95%CrI,0.69-0.99]),SGLT2 抑制剂是降低心力衰竭入院风险的最佳药物类别。敏感性分析结果表明,随着药物类别使用的增加,心力衰竭入院风险逐渐降低,平均秩次提高。
这项研究的结果表明,SGLT2 抑制剂是 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 的最佳药物类别,与最近的指南推荐一致。SGLT2 抑制剂、ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 和β-受体阻滞剂联合使用的增加可能与心力衰竭住院的累积获益相关,而不是 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者的全因死亡。