Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Jun 1;22(2):263-272. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.263. eCollection 2023 Jun.
To explore the effects of 8-week polarized training (POL), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and threshold training (THR) interventions on the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) of untrained healthy young adults. This study recruited 36 young adults and randomly assigned them to POL, HIIT, THR, or control (CG) groups to undergo an 8-week training intervention. The training impulse applied to all three intervention groups was identical. The training intensity was divided into Zone 1, 2, and 3 (Z1, Z2 and Z3) on the basis of the ventilatory thresholds (VT). The weekly training intensity distribution for POL was 75% of Z1 and 25% of Z3; HIIT was 100% of Z3 and THR was 50% of Z1 and 50% of Z2. Each group underwent Bruce protocol testing and supramaximal testing before, during, and after the intervention; relevant CRF parameters were assessed. 8 weeks of POL and HIIT significantly increased VT ( < 0.05); 8 weeks of POL, HIIT, THR and significantly increased VO and TTE ( < 0.05). The effect size of POL in relation to VO and TTE improvements was greater than that of HIIT and THR (g = 2.67 vs. 1.26 and 1.49; g = 2.75 vs. 2.05 and 1.60). Aerobic training models with different intensity distributions have different time effects on improving CRF. Relative to HIIT and THR, POL improved more variables of CRF. Therefore, POL is a feasible aerobic training method for improving CRF.
探讨 8 周极化训练(POL)、高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和阈训练(THR)对未经训练的健康年轻成年人心肺功能(CRF)的影响。本研究招募了 36 名年轻人,并将他们随机分配到 POL、HIIT、THR 或对照组(CG)组进行 8 周的训练干预。所有三组干预组都接受相同的训练刺激。在通气阈值(VT)的基础上,将训练强度分为区 1、2 和 3(Z1、Z2 和 Z3)。POL 的每周训练强度分布为 Z1 的 75%和 Z3 的 25%;HIIT 为 Z3 的 100%,THR 为 Z1 的 50%和 Z2 的 50%。每组在干预前后进行 Bruce 方案测试和最大测试;评估相关的 CRF 参数。8 周的 POL 和 HIIT 显著增加了 VT(<0.05);8 周的 POL、HIIT、THR 和显著增加了 VO 和 TTE(<0.05)。与 VO 和 TTE 改善相关的 POL 效果大小大于 HIIT 和 THR(g=2.67 与 1.26 和 1.49;g=2.75 与 2.05 和 1.60)。具有不同强度分布的有氧训练模式对改善 CRF 的时间效应不同。与 HIIT 和 THR 相比,POL 改善了更多的 CRF 变量。因此,POL 是一种可行的改善 CRF 的有氧训练方法。