Suppr超能文献

高频低潮气量通气改善 AF 消融的长期预后:一项多中心前瞻性研究。

High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Improves Long-Term Outcomes in AF Ablation: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

机构信息

Arrhythmia Institute at Grandview, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;9(8 Pt 2):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and simple strategy to improve catheter stability and first-pass isolation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. However, the impact of this technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess acute and long-term outcomes of HFLTV ventilation compared with standard ventilation (SV) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients undergoing PAF ablation using either HFLTV or SV were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and hospitalizations at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients were included. Compared with those in the SV group, patients in the HFLTV group had shorter procedural (66 [IQR: 51-88] minutes vs 80 [IQR: 61-110] minutes; P < 0.001), total RF (13.5 [IQR: 10-19] minutes vs 19.9 [IQR: 14.7-26.9] minutes; P < 0.001), and PV RF (11.1 [IQR: 8.8-14] minutes vs 15.3 [IQR: 12.4-20.4] minutes; P < 0.001) times. First-pass PV isolation was higher in the HFLTV group (66.6% vs 63.8%; P = 0.036). At 12 months, 185 of 216 (85.6%) in the HFLTV group were free from all-atrial arrhythmia, compared with 353 of 445 (79.3%) patients in the SV group (P = 0.041). HLTV was associated with a 6.3% absolute reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, lower rate of AF-related symptoms (12.5% vs 18.9%; P = 0.046), and hospitalizations (1.4% vs 4.7%; P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

HFLTV ventilation during catheter ablation of PAF improved freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF-related symptoms, and AF-related hospitalizations with shorter procedural times.

摘要

背景

高频、小潮气量(HFLTV)通气是一种安全且简单的策略,可以改善肺静脉(PV)隔离过程中的导管稳定性和首次通过隔离。然而,这种技术对长期临床结果的影响尚未确定。

目的

本研究旨在评估高频、小潮气量通气(HFLTV)与标准通气(SV)在阵发性心房颤动(PAF)射频消融中的急性和长期结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性多中心登记研究(REAL-AF)中,纳入了使用 HFLTV 或 SV 进行 PAF 消融的患者。主要终点是 12 个月时无任何房性心律失常。次要终点包括手术特点、房颤相关症状和 12 个月时的住院情况。

结果

共纳入 661 例患者。与 SV 组相比,HFLTV 组的手术时间(66[IQR:51-88]分钟 vs 80[IQR:61-110]分钟;P<0.001)、总射频时间(13.5[IQR:10-19]分钟 vs 19.9[IQR:14.7-26.9]分钟;P<0.001)和 PV 射频时间(11.1[IQR:8.8-14]分钟 vs 15.3[IQR:12.4-20.4]分钟;P<0.001)均较短。HFLTV 组首次通过 PV 隔离率更高(66.6% vs 63.8%;P=0.036)。12 个月时,HFLTV 组 216 例患者中有 185 例(85.6%)无任何房性心律失常,SV 组 445 例患者中有 353 例(79.3%)(P=0.041)。HFLTV 可使房性心律失常复发的绝对风险降低 6.3%,房颤相关症状发生率(12.5% vs 18.9%;P=0.046)和房颤相关住院率(1.4% vs 4.7%;P=0.043)降低。两组并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

在 PAF 导管消融中使用高频、小潮气量通气可缩短手术时间,提高无房性心律失常复发、房颤相关症状和房颤相关住院率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验