Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital of Salamanca, CIBER CV, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Dec;112(12):1790-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02237-w. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited.
This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed.
The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared.
Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37-558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%).
Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events.
左心耳封堵(LAAC)术后与不良结局相关的器械相关血栓(DRT),如缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞(SE)。关于 DRT 背景下发生卒中/SE 的预测因素的数据有限。
本研究旨在确定 DRT 患者发生卒中/SE 的易患因素。此外,还分析了卒中/SE 与 DRT 诊断的时间关系。
EUROC-DRT 登记研究纳入了 176 例 LAAC 后诊断为 DRT 的患者。将有症状的 DRT 患者(即在 DRT 诊断背景下发生卒中/SE 的患者)与无症状的 DRT 患者进行比较。比较了基线特征、抗血栓治疗方案、器械位置以及卒中/SE 的发生时间。
176 例诊断为 DRT 的患者中有 25 例(14.2%)发生卒中/SE(有症状的 DRT)。LAAC 后中位 198 天(IQR 37-558)发生卒中/SE。45.8%的卒中/SE发生在 DRT 诊断前/后 1 个月内(与 DRT 相关的卒中)。有症状的 DRT 患者的左心室射血分数较低(50.0±9.1% vs. 54.2±11.0%,p=0.03),非阵发性心房颤动发生率较高(84.0% vs. 64.9%,p=0.06)。其他基线参数和器械位置没有差异。大多数缺血性事件发生在接受单一抗血小板治疗的患者中(50%),但也观察到双联抗血小板治疗(25%)或口服抗凝治疗(20%)时发生卒中/SE。
14.2%的患者记录到卒中/SE,这些事件既与 DRT 发现密切相关,也与 DRT 发现时间无关。危险因素的识别仍然很困难,这使所有 DRT 患者发生卒中/SE 的风险显著增加。需要进一步的研究来降低 DRT 和缺血性事件的风险。