• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心耳封堵术后利伐沙班剂量降低与双联抗血小板治疗对比:ADRIFT一项随机试验性研究

Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: ADRIFT a Randomized Pilot Study.

作者信息

Duthoit Guillaume, Silvain Johanne, Marijon Eloi, Ducrocq Grégory, Lepillier Antoine, Frere Corinne, Dimby Solohaja-Faniaha, Popovic Batric, Lellouche Nicolas, Martin-Toutain Isabelle, Spaulding Christian, Brochet Eric, Attias David, Mansourati Jacques, Lorgis Luc, Klug Didier, Zannad Noura, Hauguel-Moreau Marie, Braik Nassim, Deltour Sandrine, Ceccaldi Alexandre, Wang Hui, Hammoudi Nadjib, Brugier Delphine, Vicaut Eric, Juliard Jean-Michel, Montalescot Gilles

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials, Initiatives and Organized Networks), INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France (G.D., J.S., N.B., A.C., N.H., D.B., G.M.).

European Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP; Paris Descartes University, INSERM U 970, France (E.M., C.S.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481
PMID:32674675
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) exposes to the risk of device thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation who frequently have a contraindication to full anticoagulation. Thereby, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is usually preferred. No randomized study has evaluated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant after LAAC, and we decided to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced doses of rivaroxaban after LAAC.

METHODS

ADRIFT (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure) is a multicenter, phase IIb study, which randomized 105 patients after successful LAAC to either rivaroxaban 10 mg (R, n=37), rivaroxaban 15 mg (R, n=35), or DAPT with aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg (n=33). The primary end point was thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1+2) measured 2 to 4 hours after drug intake, 10 days after treatment initiation. Thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimers, rivaroxaban concentrations were also measured at 10 days and 3 months. Clinical end points were evaluated at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The primary end point was reduced with R (179 pmol/L [interquartile range (IQR), 129-273], <0.0001) and R (163 pmol/L [IQR, 112-231], <0.0001) as compared with DAPT (322 pmol/L [IQR, 218-528]). We observed no significant reduction of the primary end point between R and R while rivaroxaban concentrations increased significantly from 184 ng/mL (IQR, 127-290) with R to 274 ng/mL (IQR, 192-377) with R, <0.0001. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and D-dimers were numerically lower with both rivaroxaban doses than with DAPT. These findings were all confirmed at 3 months. The clinical end points were not different between groups. A device thrombosis was noted in 2 patients assigned to DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombin generation measured after LAAC was lower in patients treated by reduced rivaroxaban doses than DAPT, supporting an alternative to the antithrombotic regimens currently used after LAAC and deserves further evaluation in larger studies. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03273322.

摘要

背景

经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAC)使房颤患者面临器械血栓形成的风险,这些患者通常有完全抗凝的禁忌证。因此,双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)通常更受青睐。尚无随机研究评估LAAC术后使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药的情况,我们决定评估LAAC术后低剂量利伐沙班的疗效和安全性。

方法

ADRIFT(房颤患者左心耳封堵术后双重抗血小板治疗与利伐沙班的评估)是一项多中心IIb期研究,将105例LAAC成功后的患者随机分为利伐沙班10mg组(R,n = 37)、利伐沙班15mg组(R,n = 35)或阿司匹林75mg加氯吡格雷75mg的DAPT组(n = 33)。主要终点是在开始治疗10天后,服药2至4小时后测量的凝血酶生成(凝血酶原片段1 + 2)。在第10天和第3个月时还测量了凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶复合物、D - 二聚体、利伐沙班浓度。在3个月的随访中评估临床终点。

结果

与DAPT组(322 pmol/L [四分位间距(IQR),218 - 528])相比,R组(179 pmol/L [IQR,129 - 273],<0.0001)和R组(163 pmol/L [IQR,112 - 231],<0.0001)的主要终点降低。我们观察到R组和R组之间主要终点无显著降低,而利伐沙班浓度从R组的184 ng/mL(IQR,127 - 290)显著增加到R组的274 ng/mL(IQR,192 - 377),<0.0001。两种利伐沙班剂量的凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶复合物和D - 二聚体在数值上均低于DAPT组。这些结果在3个月时均得到证实。各组临床终点无差异。DAPT组有2例患者发生器械血栓形成。

结论

LAAC术后接受低剂量利伐沙班治疗的患者凝血酶生成低于DAPT组,这支持了LAAC术后目前使用的抗血栓治疗方案的替代方案,值得在更大规模研究中进一步评估。注册信息:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT03273322。

相似文献

1
Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: ADRIFT a Randomized Pilot Study.左心耳封堵术后利伐沙班剂量降低与双联抗血小板治疗对比:ADRIFT一项随机试验性研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008481. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
Short-Term Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.经导管左心耳封堵术后短期口服抗凝治疗与抗血小板治疗的比较
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;13(8):e009039. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009039. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure followed by single antiplatelet therapy: Short- and mid-term outcomes.经皮左心耳封堵术后单药抗血小板治疗:短期和中期结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;110(4):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.09.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
Low-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The ADALA Randomized Clinical Trial.左心耳封堵术后低剂量直接口服抗凝治疗与双联抗血小板治疗对比:ADALA随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Oct 1;9(10):922-926. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2335.
5
Novel Oral Anticoagulant Based Versus Vitamin K Antagonist Based Double Therapy Among Stented Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the PIONEER AF-PCI Trial.新型口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂双联治疗伴房颤的支架置入患者:来自 PIONEER AF-PCI 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov;12(11):e008160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008160. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Antithrombotic Therapy and Device-Related Thrombosis Following Endovascular Left Atrial Appendage Closure.经血管左心耳封堵术后的抗血栓治疗与器械相关血栓形成。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.001. Epub 2019 May 15.
7
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN.经 WATCHMAN 左心耳封堵术后口服抗凝与抗血小板治疗的倾向性匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.004.
8
Device Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Is Related to Patient and Procedural Characteristics but Not to Duration of Postimplantation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械血栓与患者和操作特征相关,但与双联抗血小板治疗的植入后持续时间无关。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005997. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005997.
9
Antithrombotic triple therapy and coagulation activation at the site of thrombus formation: a randomized trial in healthy subjects.抗血栓三联疗法与血栓形成部位的凝血激活:一项在健康受试者中的随机试验。
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Nov;12(11):1850-60. doi: 10.1111/jth.12726. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Perioperative Treatment with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran on Changes of Coagulation and Platelet Activation Biomarkers following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.利伐沙班和达比加群在左心耳封堵术后凝血和血小板活化生物标志物变化中的围手术期治疗。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2024 Mar 12;2024:4405152. doi: 10.1155/2024/4405152. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal duration of anticoagulation after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左心耳封堵术后抗凝的最佳持续时间:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04736-2.
2
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Expanding Indications and New Developments.左心耳封堵术:适应证拓展与新进展
Struct Heart. 2024 Aug 3;9(1):100354. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100354. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention: current challenges and future perspectives.
经皮左心耳封堵预防卒中:当前挑战与未来展望
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02624-5.
4
First-in-Human Percutaneous Epicardial-Only Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Sierra Left Atrial Appendage Ligation System.使用Sierra左心耳结扎系统进行首例经皮仅心外膜途径左心耳封闭术。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 5;13(23):7417. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237417.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Low or Reduced Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.左心耳封堵术后低剂量或减量直接口服抗凝剂与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e69979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69979. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.侵入性心血管操作引起的临床和亚临床急性脑损伤。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):273-303. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
7
Cerebral Embolic Protection: Is There a Benefit for Left Atrial and Mitral Valve Procedures?脑栓塞保护:对于左心房和二尖瓣手术是否有益?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1341-1346. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02132-4. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
8
Current Antithrombotic Treatments for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.心血管疾病的当前抗血栓治疗:全面综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 8;25(8):281. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508281. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter structural heart intervention.经导管结构性心脏病介入治疗的抗栓治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Aug 19;20(16):972-986. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01084.
10
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Oral Anticoagulants for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.左心耳封堵与口服抗凝药物用于房颤患者的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e034815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034815. Epub 2024 Aug 9.