Suppr超能文献

奥克兰含糖饮料税对含糖饮料和替代饮料价格促销的影响。

The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on price promotions of sugar-sweetened and alternative beverages.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0285956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285956. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The goal of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes is to raise the prices of SSBs to decrease consumption. Price promotions play an important role in the sales of SSBs and could potentially be used by manufacturers to weaken the impact of such taxes. The purpose of this study is to determine how price promotions changed after the introduction of the 2017 Oakland SSB tax. A difference-in-differences study design was used to compare changes in prices and the prevalence and amount of price promotions for beverages in Oakland, California, relative to Sacramento, California, using two different datasets. Nielsen Retail Scanner data included price promotions for beverages sold and store audit data included price promotions offered by retailers. Changes were analyzed for SSBs, noncalorically sweetened beverages, and unsweetened beverages. After the implementation of the tax, the prevalence of price promotions for SSBs did not change significantly in Oakland relative to the comparison site of Sacramento. However, the depth of price promotions increased by an estimated 0.35 cents per ounce (P<0.001) based on the Nielsen retail scanner data and by 0.39 cents per ounce (P<0.001) based on the store audit data. This increase in the amount by which SSBs were price promoted following the introduction of the Oakland SSB tax may reflect a strategy by manufacturers to weaken the tax and/or retailers to bolster demand.

摘要

含糖饮料(SSB)征税的目的是提高 SSB 的价格,以减少其消费。价格促销在 SSB 的销售中起着重要作用,制造商可能会利用这一点来削弱此类税收的影响。本研究旨在确定 2017 年奥克兰 SSB 税出台后,价格促销活动发生了怎样的变化。本研究采用双重差分设计,使用两个不同的数据集,比较了加利福尼亚州奥克兰市与加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市之间饮料价格和价格促销活动的流行程度和数量的变化。尼尔森零售扫描器数据包括销售的饮料的价格促销活动,商店审计数据包括零售商提供的价格促销活动。对 SSB、非热量甜味饮料和非甜味饮料进行了分析。在该税收实施后,奥克兰市 SSB 的价格促销活动的流行率与萨克拉门托市的比较点相比并没有显著变化。然而,根据尼尔森零售扫描器数据,价格促销的深度增加了约 0.35 美分/盎司(P<0.001),根据商店审计数据则增加了 0.39 美分/盎司(P<0.001)。奥克兰 SSB 税出台后,SSB 价格促销活动的数量增加,这可能反映了制造商削弱税收和/或零售商提振需求的策略。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on price promotions of sugar-sweetened and alternative beverages.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0285956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285956. eCollection 2023.
2
Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114537. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
5
Longer-term impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on fast-food beverage prices: evidence from Oakland, California, 2-year post-tax.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3571-3575. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005212. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
7
No long-term store marketing changes following sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation: Oakland, California.
Health Place. 2021 Mar;68:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102512. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Retail Prices After Excise Taxes in Oakland and San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1017-1023. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305602. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Philadelphia Beverage Tax's Impact on Beverage Ad Expenditures and Number of Ads Purchased.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114537. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
3
The impact of the Oakland SSB tax on prices and volume sold: A study of intended and unintended consequences.
Health Econ. 2021 Aug;30(8):1745-1771. doi: 10.1002/hec.4267. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
No long-term store marketing changes following sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation: Oakland, California.
Health Place. 2021 Mar;68:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102512. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies: Progress and Promise.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:439-461. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-103005. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
The Dose Makes the Poison: Sugar and Obesity in the United States - a Review.
Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2019;69(3):219-233. doi: 10.31883/pjfns/110735.
10
The potential cost-effectiveness of mandatory restrictions on price promotions for sugar-sweetened beverages in Australia.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 May;44(5):1011-1020. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0495-9. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验