Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Apr 1;49(7):E80-E86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004741. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
Retrospective matched case cohort.
Compare postoperative opioid utilization and prescribing behaviors between patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after posterior spinal fusion (PSF).
Opioids are an essential component of pain management after PSF. However, due to the potential for opioid use disorder and dependence, current analgesic strategies aim to minimize their use, especially in younger patients. Limited information exists on opioid utilization after PSF for syndromic scoliosis.
Twenty adolescents undergoing PSF with MFS were matched with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:2) by age, sex, degree of spinal deformity, and the number of vertebral levels fused. Inpatient and outpatient pharmaceutical data were reviewed for the quantity and duration of opioid and adjunct medications. Prescriptions were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) using CDC's standard conversion factor.
Compared with patients with AIS, patients with MFS had significantly greater total inpatient MME use (4.9 vs . 2.1 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and longer duration of intravenous patient-controlled anesthesia (3.4 vs . 2.5 d, P = 0.001). Within the first 2 postop days, MFS patients had more patient-controlled anesthesia boluses (91 vs . 52 boluses, P = 0.01) despite similar pain scores and greater use of adjunct medications. After accounting for prior opioid use, MFS was the only significant predictor of requesting an opioid prescription after discharge (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-14.9, P = 0.03). Patients with MFS were also more likely to be discharged with a more potent prescription (1.0 vs . 0.72 MME per day/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and to receive a longer-duration prescription (13 vs . 8 d, P = 0.005) with a greater MME/kg (11.6 vs . 5.6 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) as outpatients.
Despite a similar intervention, patients with MFS and AIS seem to differ in their postoperative opioid usage after PSF, presenting an opportunity for further research to assist clinicians in better anticipating the analgesic needs of individual patients, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid epidemic.
回顾性匹配病例队列。
比较 Marfan 综合征(MFS)和青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者后路脊柱融合(PSF)后术后阿片类药物的使用和处方行为。
阿片类药物是 PSF 后疼痛管理的重要组成部分。然而,由于阿片类药物使用障碍和依赖的潜在风险,目前的镇痛策略旨在尽量减少其使用,尤其是在年轻患者中。关于综合征性脊柱侧凸 PSF 后阿片类药物的使用信息有限。
20 名接受 MFS PSF 的青少年与 AIS 患者(比例为 1:2)按年龄、性别、脊柱畸形程度和融合的椎体数量进行匹配。回顾性审查住院和门诊药物数据,以评估阿片类药物和辅助药物的数量和使用时间。使用疾病预防控制中心的标准换算因子将处方转换为吗啡毫克当量(MME)。
与 AIS 患者相比,MFS 患者的总住院 MME 使用量明显更高(4.9 与 2.1 mg/kg,P ≤ 0.001),静脉自控镇痛持续时间更长(3.4 与 2.5 d,P = 0.001)。在前 2 个术后天内,尽管 MFS 患者的疼痛评分相似,且辅助药物使用量更大,但他们的自控镇痛推注次数更多(91 与 52 次,P = 0.01)。在考虑到先前的阿片类药物使用后,MFS 是出院后要求开具阿片类药物处方的唯一显著预测因素(比值比:4.1,95%置信区间:1.1-14.9,P = 0.03)。MFS 患者出院时也更有可能开具更有效的处方(1.0 与 0.72 MME/天/kg,P ≤ 0.001)和开具更长时间的处方(13 与 8 d,P = 0.005),出院时 MME/kg 更高(11.6 与 5.6 mg/kg,P ≤ 0.001)。
尽管干预措施相似,但 MFS 和 AIS 患者 PSF 后的术后阿片类药物使用似乎存在差异,这为进一步研究提供了机会,以帮助临床医生更好地预测个体患者的镇痛需求,特别是考虑到阿片类药物滥用的持续流行。