Suppr超能文献

根治性放疗能否成为大涎腺淋巴上皮癌的治疗选择: upfront 手术与 upfront 放化疗的临床结局比较。

Could definitive radiotherapy be a treatment option for lymphoepithelial carcinoma of major salivary gland: Comparison of clinical outcomes of upfront surgery and upfront chemoradiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, 283 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha 410013, PR China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2023 Aug;143:106443. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106443. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment and associated clinical outcomes for lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the major salivary gland (LECSG) are currently unclear. As such, the purpose of this study was to assess the survival rates of LECSG patients who received either upfront surgery or upfront chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed cases of LECSG patients treated at our center from January 2010 to April 2021. The cumulative incidences of overall survival rate (OS) and locoregional failure-free survival rate (LRFFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In order to balance potential risk factors between the treatment groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio.

RESULTS

The study enrolled a total of 107 patients, among whom 24 received surgery alone, 56 underwent surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy, and 27 underwent definitive radiotherapy. The 5-year LRFFS rate and 5-year OS rate for the entire cohort were 86.6% and 84.4%, respectively. Following PSM, the 5-year LRFFS and OS rates for the upfront CRT cases were comparable to those of upfront surgery, both before and after matching. However, the upfront surgery group showed a tendency toward more de novo facial nerve injury and post-treatment facial nerve injury.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that upfront CRT is as effective as upfront surgery in terms of locoregional control and overall survival for LECSG patients. Therefore, upfront CRT could be considered a viable treatment option, potentially avoiding the risks associated with surgical intervention.

摘要

目的

目前对于涎腺淋巴上皮癌(LECSG)的最佳治疗方法及相关临床结局尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估接受根治性手术或根治性放化疗(CRT)的 LECSG 患者的生存率。

材料和方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月在我中心治疗的 LECSG 患者的病例。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估总生存率(OS)和局部区域无失败生存率(LRFFS)的累积发生率。为了平衡治疗组之间的潜在风险因素,我们进行了 1:1 的倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

该研究共纳入 107 例患者,其中 24 例单独接受手术,56 例接受手术联合术后放疗,27 例接受根治性放疗。全组患者的 5 年 LRFFS 率和 5 年 OS 率分别为 86.6%和 84.4%。PSM 后, upfront CRT 组的 5 年 LRFFS 和 OS 率与 upfront 手术组在匹配前后均相当。然而, upfront 手术组有更多新发面神经损伤和治疗后面神经损伤的趋势。

结论

本研究结果表明,对于 LECSG 患者, upfront CRT 在局部区域控制和总体生存方面与 upfront 手术同样有效。因此, upfront CRT 可以被认为是一种可行的治疗选择,可能避免了手术干预的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验