Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Dec;38(12):2691-2697. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.095. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
The utility of the synovial alpha-defensin test in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic utility of this test.
A retrospective review was conducted to identify adults evaluated for PJI following total knee arthroplasty at a single institution. Patient demographics, laboratory results, and operative details were recorded. Using the 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, cases were categorized as definitive, inconclusive, or negative for PJI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each MSIS criterion was determined. The number of patients whose PJI diagnosis was contingent on alpha-defensin positivity was calculated.
Overall, 172 total knee arthroplasty patients were included, who had an average age of 70.4 years (range, 39 to 95). Of the 21 patients who met major criteria, 20 (95.2%) were alpha-defensin positive. Of the remaining 151 patients, 85 did not meet minor criteria, all of whom were alpha-defensin negative. Among the 30 patients who met minor criteria, 28 (93.3%) were alpha-defensin positive and 2 (6.7%) were negative. The remaining 36 patients were deemed inconclusive preoperatively. In total, alpha-defensin testing changed the diagnosis in only 9 of 172 patients (5.2%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of alpha-defensin in this cohort were 94.1, 100, 100, and 97.6, respectively.
Alpha-defensin may assist in the diagnosis of PJI when a preoperative workup is inconclusive. However, this test is often unnecessary when the diagnosis of PJI can be made using the 2018 MSIS criteria.
滑膜α-防御素检测在诊断人工关节周围感染(PJI)中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨该检测的诊断价值。
回顾性分析单中心行全膝关节置换术患者的资料,根据 2018 年 Musculoskeletal Infection Society(MSIS)标准,将患者分为确诊、不确定和阴性。记录患者的人口统计学、实验室结果和手术细节。确定每个 MSIS 标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。计算依赖α-防御素阳性诊断 PJI 的患者数量。
共纳入 172 例全膝关节置换术患者,平均年龄 70.4 岁(39~95 岁)。21 例符合主要标准的患者中,20 例(95.2%)α-防御素阳性。在其余 151 例患者中,85 例未符合次要标准,均为α-防御素阴性。在符合次要标准的 30 例患者中,28 例(93.3%)α-防御素阳性,2 例(6.7%)阴性。其余 36 例患者术前诊断不确定。总的来说,α-防御素检测仅改变了 172 例患者中的 9 例(5.2%)的诊断。在本队列中,α-防御素的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94.1%、100%、100%和 97.6%。
当术前检查不确定时,α-防御素可能有助于诊断 PJI。然而,当可以使用 2018 年 MSIS 标准诊断 PJI 时,该检测通常是不必要的。