Suppr超能文献

詹姆斯·A·兰迪青年研究者奖:大道至简:所有肌肉骨骼感染学会的检测都有助于诊断假体周围关节感染吗?

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Keeping It Simple: Are all Musculoskeletal Infection Society Tests Useful to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

机构信息

NYU Langone, Adult Reconstructive Division, New York, New York.

NYU Langone, Adult Reconstructive Division, New York, New York; Division of orthopedic surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S3-S7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current data evaluating the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of advanced diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis, including alpha-defensin and synovial C-reactive protein (CRP), is conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of preoperative and intraoperative PJI workups without utilizing these tests.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis identified all patients who underwent revision total knee or hip arthroplasty (rTKA and rTHA, respectively) for suspected PJI between 2018 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Perioperative data and lab results were collected, and cases were dichotomized based on whether they met the 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. In total, 204 rTKA and 158 rTHA cases suspected of PJI were reviewed.

RESULTS

Nearly 100% of the cases were categorized as "infected" for meeting the 2018 MSIS criteria without utilization of alpha-defensin or synovial CRP (rTKA: n = 193, 94.6%; rTHA: n = 156, 98.7%). Most cases were classified as PJI preoperatively by meeting either the major MSIS or the combinational minor MSIS criteria of traditional lab tests (rTKA: n = 177, 86.8%; rTHA: n = 143, 90.5%). A subset of cases was classified as PJI by meeting combinational preoperative and intraoperative MSIS criteria (rTKA: 16, 7.8%; rTHA: 13, 8.2%). Only 3.6% of all cases were considered "inconclusive" using preoperative and intraoperative data.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high rate of cases satisfying PJI criteria during preoperative workup using our available tests, the synovial alpha-defensin and synovial CRP tests may not be necessary in the routine diagnostic workup of PJI. We suggest that the primary PJI workup process should be based on a stepwise algorithmic approach with the most economical testing necessary to determine a diagnosis first. The use of advanced, commercialized, and costly biomarkers should be utilized only when traditional testing is indeterminate.

摘要

背景

目前评估用于诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)的先进诊断测试的临床价值和成本效益的数据存在冲突,包括α-防御素和滑液 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。本研究旨在评估不使用这些测试的情况下进行术前和术中 PJI 检查的充分性。

方法

本回顾性分析确定了 2018 年至 2020 年间因疑似 PJI 接受翻修全膝关节或髋关节置换术(rTKA 和 rTHA)的所有患者,且随访时间至少 2 年。收集围手术期数据和实验室结果,并根据是否符合 2018 年肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)的 PJI 标准将病例分为两组。共回顾了 204 例 rTKA 和 158 例 rTHA 疑似 PJI 病例。

结果

在不使用α-防御素或滑液 CRP 的情况下,几乎所有病例(rTKA:n=193,94.6%;rTHA:n=156,98.7%)均被归类为“感染”,符合 2018 年 MSIS 标准。大多数病例术前通过满足主要 MSIS 或传统实验室测试的组合次要 MSIS 标准被归类为 PJI(rTKA:n=177,86.8%;rTHA:n=143,90.5%)。一部分病例通过满足术前和术中 MSIS 标准的组合被归类为 PJI(rTKA:16,7.8%;rTHA:13,8.2%)。仅 3.6%的病例使用术前和术中数据被认为“不确定”。

结论

鉴于术前检查中使用我们现有的测试满足 PJI 标准的病例比例较高,滑液α-防御素和滑液 CRP 测试可能不是 PJI 常规诊断检查所必需的。我们建议,应根据逐步算法的方法进行主要 PJI 检查过程,首先进行最经济的测试以确定诊断。仅在传统测试不确定时,才应使用先进的、商业化的和昂贵的生物标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验