• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济、生活方式和生物学决定因素对宫颈筛查覆盖率的影响:丹麦洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究。

Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.

Omicron Aps, Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):568-573. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad091.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckad091
PMID:37295965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10393493/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage.

METHODS

In Denmark, women aged 23-64 are free of charge personally invited to screening. All cervical cell samples are registered centrally in the Patobank. We linked data from the Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS) with Patobank data. LOFUS was a population-based health survey undertaken in 2016-2020. With logistic regression, coverage defined as ≥1 cervical sample registered within a 6-year period from 2015 to 2020 was compared across levels of risk factors expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 13 406 women of screening aged 23-64 and invited to LOFUS, 72% had ≥1 cervical sample registered. Non-participation in LOFUS was a strong predictor of low coverage; aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.31-0.36. Among LOFUS participants, education was a strong predictor of coverage in univariate analysis, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48-0.71, but this association disappeared in multi-variate analysis, aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.10. In multi-variate analysis, predictors of low coverage were high age, living without a partner, retired, current smoker, poor self-rated health, elevated blood pressure and elevated glycated haemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with low cervical screening coverage had limited contact to healthcare, exemplified by non-participation in LOFUS, and pertinent health and social problems, exemplified by elevated blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin, poor self-rated health, and retirement already in screening age. Structural changes in screening are needed to reach non-screened women.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌是可预防的。筛查对于早期发现至关重要。然而,即使在高收入国家,覆盖率也不理想。我们确定了社会经济、生活方式和生物学因素对宫颈癌筛查覆盖率的影响。

方法

在丹麦,23-64 岁的女性可免费接受个人邀请进行筛查。所有宫颈细胞样本都在中央的 Patobank 中进行登记。我们将来自洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究(LOFUS)的数据与 Patobank 数据进行了关联。LOFUS 是 2016-2020 年进行的一项基于人群的健康调查。通过逻辑回归,将 2015 年至 2020 年 6 年内至少有 1 份宫颈样本登记的覆盖率定义为因变量,与各危险因素水平进行比较,采用调整后的优势比(aOR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)表示。

结果

在 13406 名符合筛查年龄 23-64 岁且受邀参加 LOFUS 的女性中,有 72%的人至少有 1 份宫颈样本登记。未参加 LOFUS 是低覆盖率的强烈预测因素;aOR 为 0.32;95%CI 为 0.31-0.36。在 LOFUS 参与者中,教育在单因素分析中是覆盖率的一个强有力的预测因素,OR 为 0.58;95%CI 为 0.48-0.71,但在多因素分析中,这种关联消失,aOR 为 0.86;95%CI 为 0.66-1.10。在多因素分析中,低覆盖率的预测因素包括年龄较大、无伴侣生活、退休、当前吸烟者、自我报告健康状况较差、血压升高和糖化血红蛋白升高。

结论

低宫颈癌筛查覆盖率的女性与医疗保健接触有限,例如未参加 LOFUS,并且存在相关的健康和社会问题,例如血压和糖化血红蛋白升高、自我报告健康状况较差、以及在筛查年龄就已经退休。需要对筛查结构进行改革,以覆盖未接受筛查的女性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e604/10393493/087263725ba3/ckad091f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e604/10393493/81890a733bef/ckad091f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e604/10393493/087263725ba3/ckad091f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e604/10393493/81890a733bef/ckad091f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e604/10393493/087263725ba3/ckad091f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark.社会经济、生活方式和生物学决定因素对宫颈筛查覆盖率的影响:丹麦洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):568-573. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad091.
2
Non-participation in a health examination survey in a rural-provincial area of Denmark - results from the Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS).丹麦农村省级地区未参与健康检查调查——洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究(LOFUS)的结果
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Dec;52(8):951-959. doi: 10.1177/14034948231206879. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark.丹麦宫颈癌筛查未参与者的预测因素。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;38(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
4
Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: A population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23-45 years.根据健康状况、生活方式和性行为分析宫颈癌筛查参与情况:一项基于近15000名23至45岁丹麦女性的人群研究。
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106119. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106119. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Determinants for Participation in Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling among Nonattenders to Cervical Cancer Screening in Denmark.丹麦未参加宫颈癌筛查的人群中参与人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的决定因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1342-1351. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0480. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
6
Lolland-Falster Health Study: Study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study.洛兰岛-法尔斯特健康研究:一项基于家庭的前瞻性队列研究的研究方案。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jun;48(4):382-390. doi: 10.1177/1403494818799613. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.与宫颈癌筛查不参与相关的因素 - 丹麦近 50 万名女性的全国性研究。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
The influence of total hysterectomy in a cervical cancer screening population: a register-based cross-sectional study.全子宫切除术对宫颈癌筛查人群的影响:一项基于登记的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 20;17(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2371-4.
9
Socioeconomic disparity in cervical cancer screening among Korean women: 1998-2010.韩国女性宫颈癌筛查中的社会经济差异:1998-2010 年。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 6;13:553. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-553.
10
Allostatic load as predictor of mortality: a cohort study from Lolland-Falster, Denmark.应激激素负荷预测死亡率:来自丹麦洛兰岛-法尔斯特的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e057136. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057136.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and Perceptions of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Self-Sampling among Under-Screened Women in Flanders.在弗拉芒地区筛查不足的女性中使用自我采样进行宫颈癌筛查的经验与认知
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;12(17):1704. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171704.
2
Non-participation in breast screening in Denmark: Sociodemographic determinants.丹麦的乳腺癌筛查参与率低:社会人口学决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):2024. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19547-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung function in Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS).洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究中的肺功能(LOFUS)。
Clin Respir J. 2022 Oct;16(10):657-668. doi: 10.1111/crj.13536. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Operational experiences from the general implementation of HPV self-sampling to Danish screening non-attenders.HPV 自我采样在丹麦筛查未参与者中的全面实施的操作经验。
Prev Med. 2022 Jul;160:107096. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107096. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Socio-economic inequality of utilization of cancer testing in Europe: A cross-sectional study.
欧洲癌症检测利用的社会经济不平等:一项横断面研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Feb 8;26:101733. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101733. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Burden of prediabetes, undiagnosed, and poorly or potentially sub-controlled diabetes: Lolland-Falster health study.糖尿病前期、未确诊、控制不佳或潜在控制不足的负担:洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09791-2.
5
Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: A population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23-45 years.根据健康状况、生活方式和性行为分析宫颈癌筛查参与情况:一项基于近15000名23至45岁丹麦女性的人群研究。
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106119. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106119. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Education, income and occupation and their influence on the uptake of cervical cancer prevention strategies: A systematic review.教育、收入和职业及其对宫颈癌预防策略采用的影响:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Feb;29(3-4):393-415. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15094. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
7
Lolland-Falster Health Study: Study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study.洛兰岛-法尔斯特健康研究:一项基于家庭的前瞻性队列研究的研究方案。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Jun;48(4):382-390. doi: 10.1177/1403494818799613. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
8
Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.利用 HPV 自我采样预防宫颈癌:与及时选择加入程序相比,直接邮寄检测试剂盒可更有效地提高筛查参与率——一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4.
9
Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.与宫颈癌筛查不参与相关的因素 - 丹麦近 50 万名女性的全国性研究。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.社会经济和人口统计学因素对参与瑞典宫颈癌筛查计划的影响:基于人群的病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190171. eCollection 2018.