Suppr超能文献

广谱抗生素降阶梯治疗对危重症患者结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Effect of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic De-escalation on Critically Ill Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC J-11, P.O. Box 40047, Jeddah, 21499, Saudi Arabia.

Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Sep;13(3):444-452. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00124-1. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) in critically ill patients is controversial. Previous studies mainly focused on mortality; however, data are lacking about superinfection. Therefore, we aimed to identify the impact of ADE versus continuation of therapy on superinfections rate and other outcomes in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a two-center retrospective cohort study of adults initiated on broad-spectrum antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ≥ 48 h. The primary outcome was the superinfection rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day infection recurrence, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality.

RESULTS

250 patients were included, 125 in each group (ADE group and continuation group). Broad spectrum antibiotic discontinuation occurred at a mean of 7.2 ± 5.2 days in the ADE arm vs. 10.3 ± 7.7 in the continuation arm (P value = 0.001). Superinfection was numerically lower in the ADE group (6.4% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.254), but the difference was not significant. Additionally, the ADE group had shorter days to infection recurrence (P = 0.045) but a longer hospital stay (26 (14-46) vs. 21 (10-36) days; P = 0.016) and a longer ICU stay (14 (6-23) vs. 8 (4-16) days; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in superinfection rates among ICU patients whose broad-spectrum antibiotics were de-escalated versus patients whose antibiotics were continued. Future research into the association between rapid diagnostics with antibiotic de-escalation in the setting of high resistance is warranted.

摘要

目的

在危重症患者中,抗生素降阶梯(ADE)存在争议。先前的研究主要集中在死亡率上;然而,关于继发感染的数据却很缺乏。因此,我们旨在确定与继续治疗相比,ADE 对危重症患者继发感染率和其他结局的影响。

方法

这是一项在重症监护病房(ICU)中接受广谱抗生素治疗≥48 小时的成人的两中心回顾性队列研究。主要结局是继发感染率。次要结局包括 30 天内感染复发、ICU 和住院时间以及死亡率。

结果

共纳入 250 例患者,每组 125 例(ADE 组和继续治疗组)。ADE 组抗生素的平均停药时间为 7.2±5.2 天,而继续治疗组为 10.3±7.7 天(P 值=0.001)。ADE 组继发感染的发生率略低(6.4%比 10.4%;P=0.254),但差异无统计学意义。此外,ADE 组的感染复发时间更短(P=0.045),但住院时间更长(26(14-46)比 21(10-36)天;P=0.016),ICU 入住时间更长(14(6-23)比 8(4-16)天;P=0.002)。

结论

在广谱抗生素降阶梯与继续治疗的 ICU 患者中,继发感染率没有显著差异。未来需要研究在高耐药性情况下,快速诊断与抗生素降阶梯之间的关联。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验