Hofmann Amun G, Klosz Fabian R, Mlekusch Irene, Wickenhauser Georg, Walter Corinna, Assadian Afshin, Taher Fadi
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2023 May 31;12(11):3775. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113775.
Endoleaks are the most common complication after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Their correct identification is one of the main objectives of surveillance protocols after EVAR. So far, computed tomography angiography (CTA), contrast-enhanced (CEUS) and Duplex ultrasound (DUS), as well as magnetic resonance angiography, have been investigated for their ability to detect endoleaks. In general, all technologies have distinct benefits and disadvantages, with CTA and CEUS emerging as the reference standard for surveillance after EVAR. However, they are both contrast-enhancer-dependent, and CTA additionally exposes patients to ionizing radiation. In the present study, we investigated B-Flow, a type of coded-excitation ultrasound that was specifically designed to optimize the visualization of blood flow, for its ability to detect endoleaks, and compared its performance to CEUS, CTA, and DUS. In total, 34 patients were included in the analysis that accumulated in 43 distinct B-Flow investigations. They underwent a total of 132 imaging investigations. Agreement between B-Flow and other imaging modalities was high (>80.0%), while inter-method reliability can be interpreted as good. However, with B-Flow, six and one endoleaks would have been missed compared to CEUS and CTA, respectively. Regarding endoleak classification, all metrics were lower but retained an adequate level of comparison. In a subset of patients requiring intervention, B-Flow had 100% accuracy regarding both endoleak detection and classification. Ultrasonography enables endoleak detection and classification without the need for pharmaceutical contrast enhancement or radiation. Ultrasound coded-excitation imaging in the application of B-Flow could further simplify surveillance after EVAR by offering adequate accuracy without requiring intravenous contrast enhancement. Our findings may promote subsequent investigations of coded-excitation imaging for endoleak detection and classification in the surveillance after EVAR.
内漏是血管腔内主动脉修复术(EVAR)后最常见的并发症。正确识别内漏是EVAR术后监测方案的主要目标之一。到目前为止,计算机断层血管造影(CTA)、对比增强超声(CEUS)和双功超声(DUS)以及磁共振血管造影都已被研究用于检测内漏的能力。一般来说,所有技术都有明显的优缺点,CTA和CEUS已成为EVAR术后监测的参考标准。然而,它们都依赖于对比剂增强,而且CTA还会使患者暴露于电离辐射中。在本研究中,我们研究了B-Flow,一种专门设计用于优化血流可视化的编码激励超声,以检测其检测内漏的能力,并将其性能与CEUS、CTA和DUS进行比较。总共34例患者纳入分析,累积进行了43次不同的B-Flow检查。他们总共接受了132次成像检查。B-Flow与其他成像方式之间的一致性很高(>80.0%),而方法间的可靠性可解释为良好。然而,与CEUS和CTA相比,使用B-Flow分别会漏诊6例和1例内漏。关于内漏分类,所有指标都较低,但仍保持了足够的比较水平。在一部分需要干预的患者中,B-Flow在内漏检测和分类方面的准确率均为100%。超声检查能够检测和分类内漏,而无需药物对比增强或辐射。在B-Flow应用中进行超声编码激励成像,无需静脉注射对比剂增强即可提供足够的准确性,从而可进一步简化EVAR术后的监测。我们的研究结果可能会促进后续关于编码激励成像在EVAR术后监测中检测和分类内漏的研究。