Suppr超能文献

利用荧光技术对 7,8-二氢-8-氧代-2'-脱氧鸟苷进行单细胞测定:抗体与亲和素标记法比较。

Single Cell Determination of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine by Fluorescence Techniques: Antibody vs. Avidin Labeling.

机构信息

Istituto di Genetica Molecolare "Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza", CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Molecules. 2023 May 25;28(11):4326. doi: 10.3390/molecules28114326.

Abstract

An important biomarker of oxidative damage in cellular DNA is the formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). Although several methods are available for the biochemical analysis of this molecule, its determination at the single cell level may provide significant advantages when investigating the influence of cell heterogeneity and cell type in the DNA damage response. to. For this purpose, antibodies recognizing 8-oxodG are available; however, detection with the glycoprotein avidin has also been proposed because of a structural similarity between its natural ligand biotin and 8-oxodG. Whether the two procedures are equivalent in terms of reliability and sensitivity is not clear. In this study, we compared the immunofluorescence determination of 8-oxodG in cellular DNA using the monoclonal antibody N45.1 and labeling using avidin conjugated with the fluorochrome Alexa Fluor488 (AF488). Oxidative DNA damage was induced in different cell types by treatment with potassium bromate (KBrO), a chemical inducer of reactive oxygen species (ROS). By using increasing concentrations of KBrO, as well as different reaction conditions, our results indicate that the monoclonal antibody N45.1 provides a specificity of 8-oxodG labeling greater than that attained with avidin-AF488. These findings suggest that immunofluorescence techniques are best suited to the in situ analysis of 8-oxodG as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage.

摘要

细胞 DNA 中氧化损伤的一个重要生物标志物是 7,8-二氢-8-氧代-2'-脱氧鸟苷(8-oxodG)的形成。虽然有几种生化分析这种分子的方法,但在研究细胞异质性和细胞类型对 DNA 损伤反应的影响时,在单细胞水平上测定它可能具有重要优势。为此,已经有针对 8-oxodG 的抗体;然而,由于其天然配体生物素与 8-oxodG 之间的结构相似性,也提出了使用与糖蛋白亲和素结合的荧光素 avidin 进行检测。这两种方法在可靠性和灵敏度方面是否等效尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用单克隆抗体 N45.1 对细胞 DNA 中 8-oxodG 的免疫荧光测定和用与荧光染料 Alexa Fluor488(AF488)结合的亲和素进行标记。通过用化学诱导活性氧(ROS)的溴酸钾(KBrO)处理不同的细胞类型来诱导氧化 DNA 损伤。通过使用增加浓度的 KBrO 以及不同的反应条件,我们的结果表明,单克隆抗体 N45.1 提供了比 avidin-AF488 更高的 8-oxodG 标记特异性。这些发现表明,免疫荧光技术最适合作为氧化 DNA 损伤生物标志物的 8-oxodG 的原位分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/10254197/03149b7f6c00/molecules-28-04326-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验