Gender and Racial Disparities in Early Urology Exposures during Medical School.

INTRODUCTION

Workforce disparities in medicine have been well documented. Early medical school exposures have been shown to highly influence career choice. We hypothesized that gender and racial disparities exist in early medical school exposures to urology.

METHODS

We surveyed urology residency applicants who interviewed at our institution from 2016 to 2017. Student demographics were collected in addition to forms of urology exposures (clinical and research). Early urology exposure was defined as occurring before the 3rd year of medical school. Early exposures were compared by gender and racial/ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine.

RESULTS

During the study period 72 interviewees were invited to participate and 71 completed the survey (response rate 98.6%). The majority of participants were male (54, 76%). Thirteen participants (18%) met the criteria for underrepresented in medicine. Fewer female applicants discovered urology (41% vs 75%, p=0.01), first shadowed a urologist (35% vs 68%, p=0.02), first operated with a urologist (29% vs 60%, p=0.03) and began research (0% vs 49%, p <0.001) before the 3rd year of medical school compared to male applicants. Fewer applicants underrepresented in medicine had shadowed a urologist before the 3rd year of medical school (31% vs 67%, p=0.02). We found no other statistical differences between those underrepresented in medicine and those not underrepresented in medicine in terms of other early urology exposures, medical school urology opportunities or personal exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in early urology exposures, especially research exposure, exist by gender and less so among applicants underrepresented in medicine. Identifying these disparities may uncover systemic bias within career trajectories and provide targets for earlier interventions in medical school training.