Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy and Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Aug;189:112910. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 6.
In clinical trials, the assessment of safety is traditionally focused on the overall rate of high-grade and serious adverse events (AEs). A new approach to AEs evaluation, taking into account chronic low-grade AEs, single patient's perspective, and time-related information, such as ToxT analysis, should be considered especially for less intense but potentially long-lasting treatments, such as maintenance strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
We applied ToxT (Toxicity over Time) evaluation to a large cohort of mCRC patients enroled in randomised TRIBE, TRIBE2, and VALENTINO studies, in order to longitudinally describe AEs throughout the whole treatment duration and to compare AEs evolution over cycles between induction and maintenance strategies, providing numerical and graphical results overall and per single patient. After 4-6 months of combination therapy, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) + bevacizumab or panitumumab was recommended in all studies except for the 50% of patients in the VALENTINO trial who received panitumumab alone.
Out of 1400 patients included, 42% received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan)/bevacizumab, 18% FOLFIRI/bevacizumab, 24% FOLFOX/bevacizumab, 16% FOLFOX/panitumumab. Mean grade of general and haematological AEs was higher in the first cycles, then progressively decreasing after the end of induction (p < 0.001), and always remaining at the highest levels with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (p < 0.001). Neurotoxicity became more frequent over the cycles with late high-grade episodes (p < 0.001), while the incidence but not the grade of hand-and-foot syndrome gradually increased (p = 0.91). Anti-VEGF-related AEs were more severe in the first cycles, then setting over at low levels (p = 0.03), while anti-EGFR-related AEs still affected patients during maintenance.
Most of chemotherapy-related AEs (except for HFS and neuropathy) reach the highest level in the first cycles, then decrease, probably due to their active clinical management. Transition to maintenance allows relief from most AEs, especially with bevacizumab-based regimens, while anti-EGFR-related AEs may persist.
在临床试验中,安全性评估传统上侧重于高级别和严重不良事件(AE)的总体发生率。对于强度较低但潜在持续时间较长的治疗方法(如转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的维持策略),应考虑一种新的 AE 评估方法,该方法考虑到慢性低级别 AE、单个患者的观点和与时间相关的信息,如 ToxT 分析。
我们将 ToxT(随时间变化的毒性)评估应用于随机 TRIBE、TRIBE2 和 VALENTINO 研究中入组的大量 mCRC 患者队列中,以便在整个治疗期间对 AE 进行纵向描述,并比较诱导和维持策略之间每个周期的 AE 演变,提供整体和每个患者的数值和图形结果。在联合治疗 4-6 个月后,除了 VALENTINO 试验中有 50%的患者单独接受帕尼单抗外,所有研究均推荐使用 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(5-FU/LV)+贝伐单抗或帕尼单抗。
在纳入的 1400 名患者中,42%接受了 FOLFOXIRI(5-FU/LV、奥沙利铂和伊立替康)+贝伐单抗,18%接受了 FOLFIRI+贝伐单抗,24%接受了 FOLFOX+贝伐单抗,16%接受了 FOLFOX+帕尼单抗。一般和血液学 AE 的总体和血液学 AE 的平均严重程度在前几个周期更高,然后在诱导结束后逐渐降低(p<0.001),并且始终保持在 FOLFOXIRI+贝伐单抗中最高水平(p<0.001)。神经毒性在各周期中变得更加频繁,出现晚期高级别事件(p<0.001),而手足综合征的发生率但不是严重程度逐渐增加(p=0.91)。与抗血管内皮生长因子相关的 AE 在第一个周期更为严重,然后降至低水平(p=0.03),而与抗表皮生长因子受体相关的 AE 在维持治疗期间仍会影响患者。
大多数与化疗相关的 AE(除了 HFS 和神经病变)在第一个周期达到最高水平,然后下降,可能是由于其积极的临床管理。过渡到维持治疗可以缓解大多数 AE,特别是基于贝伐单抗的方案,而与抗表皮生长因子受体相关的 AE 可能持续存在。