Langeluddecke P M, Tennant C C
Br J Med Psychol. 1986 Jun;59(2):141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1986.tb02678.x.
The convergent validity of two popular self-report Type A questionnaires (the Jenkins Activity Survey and Framingham Scale), and their association with personality traits related to Type A, affective states and traits, and history of nervous illness, were assessed in a sample of 92 coronary angiography patients. The correlation between the two Type A measures, although significant, was modest. Both Type A measures had strong associations with standard personality traits (neuroticism and trait tension). The Framingham Scale was strongly correlated with distressing psychological states (tension, anxiety and depression) while the JAS showed a lesser association with these measures. The implications of these findings in terms of the convergent validity of the two Type A measures, and the independence of the Type A concept from other personality and emotional variables, are discussed.
在92名接受冠状动脉造影的患者样本中,评估了两种常用的A型行为自陈问卷(詹金斯活动调查和弗雷明汉量表)的收敛效度,以及它们与A型相关的人格特质、情感状态和特质以及神经疾病史之间的关联。两种A型测量方法之间的相关性虽然显著,但程度适中。两种A型测量方法均与标准人格特质(神经质和特质紧张)有很强的关联。弗雷明汉量表与令人痛苦的心理状态(紧张、焦虑和抑郁)密切相关,而詹金斯活动调查与这些测量方法的关联较小。讨论了这些发现对两种A型测量方法收敛效度的影响,以及A型概念与其他人格和情感变量的独立性。