Suppr超能文献

肾细胞癌部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的对比分析:在疾病分期较高的情况下进行保留肾单位手术时,肿瘤学安全性是否会受到影响?

Comparative analysis of partial versus radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Is oncologic safety compromised during nephron sparing in higher stage disease?

作者信息

Hakam Nizar, Heidar Nassib Abou, El-Asmar Jose, Khauli Mark, Degheili Jad, Al-Moussawy Mouhamad, Nasr Rami, El-Hajj Albert, Wazzan Wassim, Bulbul Muhammad, Khauli Raja B

机构信息

Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon, USA.

Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2023 Apr-Jun;15(2):226-231. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_98_22. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Over the past 20 years, the utility of partial nephrectomy (PN), compared to radical nephrectomy (RN), for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has progressively increased, particularly for larger and more complex masses. We sought to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes of PN versus RN in a single-institution cohort.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2017, 228 patients underwent RN or PN for lcT1a-T2b, N0M0 RCC at a single tertiary referral center, performed by five surgeons. The clinical end point result was (local or distant) RFS. Univariate and multivariate (cox regression) models were used to evaluate the association between type of surgery (PN vs. RN) and RFS, in the overall cohort and in a subgroup of patients with cT1b.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 (interquartile range [IQR] 48-66), and the median tumor size was 4.5 cm (IQR 3-7). There were 1 PN and 10 RN. Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (IQR 2.2-6.9), the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant RFS difference between PN and RN (logrank = 0.53). On multivariate analysis, pathologic stage ≥T2a, Fuhrman Grade ≥3, and chromophobe histology were associated with a worse RFS. PN was not significantly associated with diminished RFS (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-4.3, = 0.199) in the overall cohort compared to RN. However, in the cT1b subgroup, PN was associated with a significant increase in recurrence compared to RN (HR = 12.4, 95% CI 1.45-133.4, = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Our institutional data highlight the possibility of compromise in RFS for clinically localized RCC treated with PN compared to RN, particularly for larger and more complex masses. These data raise concern, especially in light of the nonproven association of survival benefit of PN over RN, warranting future randomized prospective studies for further evaluation.

摘要

目的

在过去20年中,与根治性肾切除术(RN)相比,部分肾切除术(PN)在局限性肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗中的应用逐渐增加,尤其是对于更大、更复杂的肿块。我们试图在一个单机构队列中比较PN与RN的无复发生存率(RFS)结果。

方法

2002年至2017年间,228例患者在一个三级转诊中心接受了由五名外科医生进行的lcT1a-T2b、N0M0 RCC的RN或PN手术。临床终点结果为(局部或远处)RFS。单因素和多因素(cox回归)模型用于评估手术类型(PN与RN)与RFS之间的关联,在整个队列以及cT1b患者亚组中进行评估。

结果

中位年龄为59岁(四分位间距[IQR]48-66),中位肿瘤大小为4.5 cm(IQR 3-7)。有1例PN和10例RN。中位随访4.2年(IQR 2.2-6.9),Kaplan-Meier分析显示PN和RN之间的RFS无显著差异(对数秩检验=0.53)。多因素分析显示,病理分期≥T2a、Fuhrman分级≥3和嫌色组织学与较差的RFS相关。与RN相比,在整个队列中PN与RFS降低无显著关联(风险比[HR]1.78,95%置信区间[CI]0.74-4.3,P=0.199)。然而,在cT1b亚组中,与RN相比,PN与复发显著增加相关(HR=12.4,95%CI 1.45-133.4,P=0.038)。

结论

我们机构的数据突出了与RN相比,PN治疗临床局限性RCC时RFS可能受损的可能性,尤其是对于更大、更复杂的肿块。这些数据引发了关注,特别是鉴于PN相对于RN的生存获益关联尚未得到证实,需要未来进行随机前瞻性研究以进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b97/10252787/4e9033f7b49e/UA-15-226-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验