Sporthopaedicum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2285-2290. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178292. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
An increased tibial slope (TS) has been identified as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and graft failure after ACL reconstruction. However, different imaging modalities are used to determine the TS, resulting in divergent values. Consequently, no reference values and no consensus on thresholds can be reached, which in turn is mandatory for indicating correction osteotomies when facing outlier TS.
To determine the mean values of the TS and the incidence of their outliers in large cohorts of patients with ACL-injured and noninjured knees and to determine the feasibility of measuring TS on conventional lateral radiographs (CLRs).
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence 3.
TS of ACL-injured knees (n = 1000, group A) and ACL-intact knees (n = 1000, group B) was measured by 3 experienced examiners. Medial TS was measured on CLRs using the technique of Dejour and Bonnin. Patients with radiographs with poor image quality, osteoarthritis, previous osteotomies, or nondigital radiographs were excluded. The intra- and interrater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
The mean TS was significantly higher in group A than in group B (10.04°± 3° [range, 2°-22°] vs 9.02°± 2.9° [range, 1°-18°], respectively; < .001). Significantly more participants in group A had TS larger than 12° (≥12°, 32.2% vs 19.8%, < .001; ≥13°, 20.9% vs 11.1%, < .001; ≥14°, 13.5% vs 5.7%, < .001; ≥15°, 8% vs 2.7%, < .001; ≥16°, 3.7% vs 1.4%, = .0005), respectively. In contrast, significantly more participatns in group B had TS 8° or less (≤8°, 32.1% vs 42.7%, < .001; ≤7°, 20% vs 30.9%, < .001; ≤6°, 12.4% vs 19.8%, < .001; ≤5°, 6.6% vs 12%, = .0003; ≤4°, 2.8% vs 5.3%, = .0045). The intraclass correlation coefficient revealed a good to excellent reliability throughout measurements.
Median values for the TS were 9° for uninjured and 10° for ACL-injured knees on CLRs. Notwithstanding its statistical significance, this finding might be negligible in clinical practice. However, a significantly larger number of outliers were found in the ACL-injured group exceeding a TS of 12° and demonstrating an incremental proportion with increasing TS, serving as a potential threshold for correction osteotomy. Furthermore, CLRs in the largest cohort to date exhibited high reproducibility, proving the feasibility of CLRs as a routine measurement for TS.
胫骨倾斜角(TS)增加已被确定为前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和 ACL 重建后移植物失败的危险因素。然而,不同的影像学方法用于确定 TS,导致结果存在差异。因此,无法达成参考值和阈值共识,而这对于面对异常 TS 时指示进行矫正截骨术又是必需的。
确定 ACL 损伤和未损伤膝关节的大样本患者中 TS 的平均值和其异常值的发生率,并确定在常规侧位 X 线片(CLR)上测量 TS 的可行性。
横断面研究;证据等级 3。
由 3 名经验丰富的检查者测量 ACL 损伤膝关节(n = 1000,A 组)和 ACL 未损伤膝关节(n = 1000,B 组)的 TS。使用 Dejour 和 Bonnin 技术在 CLR 上测量内侧 TS。排除图像质量差、骨关节炎、既往截骨术或非数字 X 线片的患者。使用组内相关系数计算内部和组间可靠性。
A 组的平均 TS 明显高于 B 组(10.04°±3°[范围,2°-22°] vs 9.02°±2.9°[范围,1°-18°], <.001)。A 组中 TS 大于 12°的患者明显更多(≥12°,32.2%比 19.8%, <.001;≥13°,20.9%比 11.1%, <.001;≥14°,13.5%比 5.7%, <.001;≥15°,8%比 2.7%, <.001;≥16°,3.7%比 1.4%, =.0005)。相比之下,B 组中 TS 为 8°或更小的患者明显更多(≤8°,32.1%比 42.7%, <.001;≤7°,20%比 30.9%, <.001;≤6°,12.4%比 19.8%, <.001;≤5°,6.6%比 12%, =.0003;≤4°,2.8%比 5.3%, =.0045)。组内相关系数显示整个测量过程具有良好到极好的可靠性。
CLR 上未损伤 ACL 的 TS 中位数为 9°,ACL 损伤的 TS 中位数为 10°。尽管具有统计学意义,但这一发现可能在临床实践中微不足道。然而,在 ACL 损伤组中发现了更多的异常值,超过 12°的 TS 且随着 TS 的增加,异常值的比例呈递增趋势,这可能是矫正截骨术的潜在阈值。此外,迄今为止最大队列的 CLR 表现出很高的可重复性,证明了 CLR 作为 TS 常规测量的可行性。