Suppr超能文献

与等待名单相比,基于网络的强化自助认知行为疗法对暴饮暴食症的经济评估:一项随机对照试验。

Economic evaluation of web-based guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced for binge-eating disorder compared to a waiting list: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Melisse Bernou, Blankers Matthijs, van den Berg Elske, de Jonge Margo, Lommerse Nick, van Furth Eric, Dekker Jack, de Beurs Edwin

机构信息

Novarum Center for Eating Disorders & Obesity, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.

Section Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Sep;56(9):1772-1784. doi: 10.1002/eat.24003. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim is to perform an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced (CBT-E) for binge-eating disorder (BED) to a waiting list control condition.

METHODS

BED patients (N = 212) were randomly assigned to guided self-help CBT-E or the 3-month waiting list. Measurements took place at baseline and the end-of-treatment. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the number of binge-eating episodes during the last 28 days as an outcome indicator according to the eating disorder examination. A cost-utility analysis was performed using the EuroQol-5D.

RESULTS

The difference in societal costs over the 3 months of the intervention between both conditions was €679 (confidence interval [CI] 50-1330). The incremental costs associated with one incremental binge eating episode prevented in the guided self-help condition was approximately €18 (CI 1-41). From a societal perspective there was a 96% likelihood that guided self-help CBT-E led to a greater number of binge-eating episodes prevented, but at higher costs. Each additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was associated with incremental costs of €34,000 (CI 2494-154,530). With a 95% likelihood guided self-help CBT-E led to greater QALY gain at higher costs compared to waiting for treatment. Based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000 per QALY, guided self-help CBT-E can be considered cost-effective with a likelihood of 95% from a societal perspective.

DISCUSSION

Guided self-help CBT-E is likely a cost-effective treatment for BED in the short-term (3-month course of treatment). Comparison to treatment-as-usual is recommended for future research, as it enables an economic evaluation with a longer time horizon.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Offering treatment remotely has several benefits for patients suffering from binge-eating disorders. Guided self-help CBT-E is an efficacious and likely cost-effective treatment, reducing binge eating and improving quality-of-life, albeit at higher societal costs.

摘要

引言

目的是在一项随机对照试验的同时进行经济评估,该试验将针对暴饮暴食症(BED)的引导式自助认知行为疗法强化版(CBT-E)与等待名单对照条件进行比较。

方法

BED患者(N = 212)被随机分配到引导式自助CBT-E组或3个月的等待名单组。测量在基线和治疗结束时进行。成本效益分析根据饮食失调检查,将过去28天内的暴饮暴食发作次数作为结果指标进行。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5D)进行成本效用分析。

结果

两种情况在干预的3个月内社会成本差异为679欧元(置信区间[CI] 50 - 1330)。在引导式自助条件下,每预防一次额外的暴饮暴食发作所产生的增量成本约为18欧元(CI 1 - 41)。从社会角度来看,引导式自助CBT-E有96%的可能性导致预防更多的暴饮暴食发作,但成本更高。每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)所产生的增量成本为34,000欧元(CI 2494 - 154,530)。与等待治疗相比,引导式自助CBT-E有95%的可能性以更高的成本带来更大的QALY增益。基于英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所每QALY 35,000欧元的支付意愿阈值,从社会角度来看,引导式自助CBT-E有95%的可能性被认为具有成本效益。

讨论

引导式自助CBT-E在短期内(3个月的治疗疗程)可能是一种具有成本效益的BED治疗方法。建议未来的研究与常规治疗进行比较,因为这样可以进行更长时间跨度的经济评估。

公共意义

远程提供治疗对患有暴饮暴食症的患者有诸多益处。引导式自助CBT-E是一种有效且可能具有成本效益的治疗方法,可减少暴饮暴食并改善生活质量,尽管社会成本较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验