Justin Ingerman Center for Palliative Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Pediatrics, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Aug 1;177(8):800-807. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.1602.
While knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known.
To determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network's Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children's hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services.
Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC.
Parents' importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100.
A total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation.
Parents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.
了解接受儿科姑息治疗(PPC)的儿童的治疗目标(GOCs)对于指导他们接受的治疗至关重要,但父母如何优先考虑这些目标,以及他们的优先级如何随时间变化尚不清楚。
确定接受姑息治疗的儿童的父母对 GOCs 的重视程度,并确定其随时间的变化模式。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项儿科姑息治疗研究网络的共享数据和研究队列研究,数据于 2017 年 4 月 10 日至 2022 年 2 月 15 日在全美 7 个儿童医院的 PPC 项目中收集,包括在医院、门诊或家中,时间为 0、2、6、12、18 和 24 个月。参与者包括接受 PPC 服务的患者,年龄从出生到 30 岁的父母。
分析根据人口统计学特征、复杂慢性疾病的数量和参加 PPC 的时间进行了调整。
父母使用离散选择实验对 5 个预先选定的 GOCs 的重要性评分:寻求生活质量(QOL)、健康、舒适、疾病改善或延长生命。5 个 GOCs 的重要性评分总和为 100。
共有 603 名患者的 680 名父母报告了 GOCs。患者的中位年龄为 4.4(IQR,0.8-13.2)岁,320 名患者为男性(53.1%)。在基线时,父母将 QOL 评为最重要的目标(平均评分 31.5[SD,8.4]),其次是健康(26.3[SD,7.5])、舒适(22.4[SD,11.7])、疾病改善(10.9[SD,9.2])和延长生命(8.9[SD,9.9])。重要的是,父母在每个目标的基线得分上存在很大差异(IQR 超过 9.4),但在不同复杂慢性疾病类别的患者中,平均得分差异很小(差异平均值小于 8.7)。自 PPC 开始以来,每个额外的研究月,QOL 的评分都会提高 0.06(95%CI,0.04-0.08),舒适度评分提高 0.3(95%CI,0-0.06),而延长生命的重要性评分降低 0.07(95%CI,0.04-0.09),疾病改善的评分降低 0.02(95%CI,0-0.04);健康评分与 PPC 开始时无显著差异。
接受 PPC 的儿童的父母将 QOL 放在首位,但存在相当大的个体水平差异,并随时间发生重大变化。这些发现强调了与父母一起重新评估 GOCs 以指导适当的临床干预的重要性。