Suppr超能文献

驱动压力引导与传统机械通气策略对心脏搭桥术后肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Li Xue-Fei, Jiang Rong-Juan, Mao Wen-Jie, Yu Hong, Xin Juan, Yu Hai

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111150. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pulmonary complications occur frequently and are associated with worse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgical patients. The advantage of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy in decreasing pulmonary complications remains to be definitively established. We aimed to investigate the effect of intraoperative driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-arm, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The West China university hospital in Sichuan, China.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who were scheduled for elective on-pump cardiac surgery were enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were randomized to receive driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration or conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy with fixed 5 cmHO of PEEP.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome of pulmonary complications (including acute respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax) within the first 7 postoperative days were prospectively identified. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary complication severity, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

Between August 2020 and July 2021, we enrolled 694 eligible patients who were included in the final analysis. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 140 (40.3%) patients in the driving pressure group and 142 (40.9%) in the conventional group (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.18; P = 0.877). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between study groups regarding the incidence of primary outcome. The driving pressure group had less atelectasis than the conventional group (11.5% vs 17.0%; relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98; P = 0.039). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery, the use of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy did not reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy.

摘要

研究目的

心脏手术患者术后肺部并发症频发,且与更差的术后结局相关。驱动压导向通气策略在降低肺部并发症方面的优势仍有待明确确立。我们旨在研究与传统肺保护性通气相比,术中驱动压导向通气策略对体外循环心脏手术后肺部并发症的影响。

设计

前瞻性、双臂、随机对照试验。

地点

中国四川华西医院。

患者

计划进行择期体外循环心脏手术的成年患者纳入本研究。

干预措施

接受体外循环心脏手术的患者被随机分配接受基于呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定的驱动压导向通气策略或固定PEEP为5 cmH₂O的传统肺保护性通气策略。

测量指标

前瞻性确定术后前7天内肺部并发症(包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征、肺不张、肺炎、胸腔积液和气胸)的主要结局。次要结局包括肺部并发症严重程度、重症监护病房住院时间、住院期间及30天死亡率。

主要结果

2020年8月至2021年7月期间,我们纳入了694例符合条件的患者并进行最终分析。驱动压组140例(40.3%)患者发生术后肺部并发症,传统组142例(40.9%)(相对风险,0.99;95%置信区间,0.82 - 1.18;P = 0.877)。意向性分析显示,研究组之间主要结局的发生率无显著差异。驱动压组的肺不张发生率低于传统组(11.5%对17.0%;相对风险,0.68;95%置信区间,0.47 - 0.98;P = 0.039)。两组间次要结局无差异。

结论

在接受体外循环心脏手术的患者中,与传统肺保护性通气策略相比,使用驱动压导向通气策略并未降低术后肺部并发症的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验