• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生的风险感知对多发性硬化症中高疗效与非高疗效疾病修正治疗之间转换治疗的影响。

Influence of physicians' risk perception on switching treatments between high- efficacy and non-high-efficacy disease‑modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Level 4, Central Wing, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Aug;76:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104770. Epub 2023 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2023.104770
PMID:37307690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision of initiating treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) with a high-efficacy DMT (HE DMT) or non-high-efficacy DMT (non-HE DMT) is influenced by several factors, including risk perception of patients and physicians.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the influence of physicians' risk perception on decision-making when switching treatments for MS and the reasons for switching.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real-World MS Disease-Specific Program (a retrospective survey) and analysis included people with RMS identified between 2017- 2021.

RESULTS

Of 4129 patients with reasons for switch available, 3538 switched from non-HE DMT and 591 from HE DMT. Overall, 4.7% of patients were switched treatment by their physicians due to the risk of malignancies and infections including PML risk. The proportion of switches that were made due to the risk of PML were 23.9% in the HE DMT and 0.5% in the non-HE DMT groups. The top reasons for switching were relapse frequency (non-HE DMT vs HE-DMT: 26.8% vs 15.2%), lack of efficacy (20.9 vs 11.7) and increased number of MRI lesions (20.3% vs 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' risk perception of malignancies and infection excluding PML was not a leading factor when switching treatment. The risk of PML was a key factor, especially for switching patients from HE DMTs. In both groups, lack of efficacy was the key contributing factor for switching. Initiating the treatment with HE DMTs may potentially reduce the number of switches due to sub-optimal efficacy. These findings might help physicians to engage more in discussions with patients about the benefit/risk profile of DMTs.

摘要

背景

启动多发性硬化症(MS)治疗时选择高效疾病修正治疗药物(HE DMT)或非高效疾病修正治疗药物(non-HE DMT)的决策受到多种因素的影响,包括患者和医生的风险感知。

目的

调查医生的风险感知对 MS 治疗转换决策的影响,以及转换的原因。

方法

数据来自 Adelphi 真实世界 MS 疾病特异性项目(回顾性调查),分析包括 2017-2021 年期间确诊为 RMS 的患者。

结果

在有转换原因的 4129 名患者中,3538 名患者从非-HE DMT 转换,591 名患者从 HE DMT 转换。总体而言,由于恶性肿瘤和感染(包括 PML 风险)的风险,有 4.7%的患者由医生决定转换治疗。在 HE DMT 组中,因 PML 风险而转换的比例为 23.9%,而非-HE DMT 组为 0.5%。转换的主要原因是复发频率(非-HE DMT 与 HE-DMT:26.8%与 15.2%)、疗效不足(20.9%与 11.7%)和 MRI 病变数量增加(20.3%与 12.4%)。

结论

医生对恶性肿瘤和感染(不包括 PML)的风险感知并不是转换治疗的主要因素。PML 风险是一个关键因素,特别是对于从 HE DMT 转换的患者。在两组中,疗效不足是转换的关键因素。使用 HE DMT 进行初始治疗可能会降低因疗效不佳而导致的转换次数。这些发现可能有助于医生更深入地与患者讨论 DMT 的获益/风险特征。

相似文献

1
Influence of physicians' risk perception on switching treatments between high- efficacy and non-high-efficacy disease‑modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.医生的风险感知对多发性硬化症中高疗效与非高疗效疾病修正治疗之间转换治疗的影响。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Aug;76:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104770. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Azathioprine for people with multiple sclerosis.硫唑嘌呤用于多发性硬化症患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 9;12(12):CD015005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015005.pub2.
3
Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗用于治疗多发性硬化症患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD013874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013874.pub3.
4
Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013874.pub2.
5
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3.
6
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 22;3(3):CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub3.
7
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2.
8
Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.干扰素β与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub3.
9
Comparative safety of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.高疗效疾病修正疗法治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Sep;43(9):5479-5500. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06197-3. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
10
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;2015(9):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep medullary veins: a promising neuroimaging marker for neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.深部髓静脉:多发性硬化症神经退行性变的一种有前景的神经影像学标志物。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):2003-2015. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1108. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption.早期在美国多发性硬化症中使用高效疗法:益处、障碍和鼓励采用的策略。
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3116-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12305-4. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
3
Evaluation of drivers of treatment switch in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a study from the Italian MS Registry.
评估复发型多发性硬化症治疗转换的驱动因素:来自意大利多发性硬化症注册研究。
J Neurol. 2024 Mar;271(3):1150-1159. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12137-8. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
Escalation Versus Induction/High-Efficacy Treatment Strategies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Which is Best for Patients?复发型多发性硬化症的升级治疗与高效治疗策略:哪种策略对患者最有利?
Drugs. 2023 Oct;83(15):1351-1363. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01942-0. Epub 2023 Sep 19.