Rasines Laura, Castillejo Noelia, San Miguel Guillermo, Aguayo Encarna
Postharvest and Refrigeration Group, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), 30202 Cartagena, Spain; Food Quality and Health Group, Institute of Plant Biotechnology (UPCT), Campus Muralla del Mar, 30202 Cartagena, Spain.
School of Industrial Engineering (ETSII), Grupo de Agroenergética, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 20;892:164779. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164779. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
The consumption stage has been identified as the largest producer of food waste (FW) across the food supply chain (FSC), with fruit and vegetables being the most affected product category. The present study aims to determine the optimal storage scenario at household level to avoid food waste and which has the lowest environmental footprint. Broccoli was stored under different storage conditions: unbagged or bagged (periodically opened) in bioplastic bags inside a domestic refrigerator at 5 or 7 °C for 34 days and then analysed for relative humidity (RH), sensory properties and bioactive compounds. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental profile of 1 kg of broccoli purchased by the consumer (cradle-to-grave). At day 0 (base scenario) the carbon footprint was 0.81 kg CO eq/kg, with the vegetable farming being the main contributor to this environmental impact, mostly driven by fertiliser (production and its emissions to air and water) and irrigation (due to electricity consumption for water pumping). Quality and food waste depended on time and storage conditions: For short storage times, within three days, the best quality combined with the lowest environmental footprint was for unbagged broccoli at 7 °C and no household food waste. However, this scenario had the highest food waste level from day 3 onwards, with increased resource loss and overall environmental footprint. For long-term storage, using a bag and storing at 5 °C helped to reduce food waste with the lowest environmental footprint. For example, at 16 days, this scenario (bagged at 5 °C) could save 4.63 kg/FU of broccoli and 3.16 kg CO eq/FU compared to the worst scenario (unbagged at 7 °C). Consumers are the key to reducing household food waste and this research provides the knowledge for improvement.
消费阶段已被认定为整个食品供应链中食品浪费的最大产生阶段,水果和蔬菜是受影响最严重的产品类别。本研究旨在确定家庭层面避免食物浪费且环境足迹最小的最佳储存方案。西兰花在不同储存条件下进行储存:在5℃或7℃的家用冰箱内,不装袋或装在生物塑料袋中(定期打开),储存34天,然后分析其相对湿度、感官特性和生物活性化合物。进行了生命周期评估(LCA)以评估消费者购买的1千克西兰花从摇篮到坟墓的环境概况。在第0天(基础情景),碳足迹为0.81千克二氧化碳当量/千克,蔬菜种植是这种环境影响的主要贡献者,主要由肥料(生产及其向空气和水的排放)和灌溉(由于抽水的电力消耗)驱动。质量和食物浪费取决于时间和储存条件:对于短时间储存,在三天内,7℃下不装袋的西兰花质量最佳且环境足迹最小,且无家庭食物浪费。然而,从第3天起,这种情景下的食物浪费水平最高,资源损失增加,整体环境足迹增大。对于长期储存,使用袋子并在5℃下储存有助于减少食物浪费且环境足迹最小。例如,在第16天,与最差情景(7℃下不装袋)相比,这种情景(5℃下装袋)可节省4.63千克/功能单位的西兰花和3.16千克二氧化碳当量/功能单位。消费者是减少家庭食物浪费的关键,本研究提供了改进所需的知识。