Millman Noah, van der Woerd Benjamin, Sund Lauren Timmons, Johns Michael
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Voice. 2023 Jun 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.05.006.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Laryngeal dystonia and vocal tremor can be debilitating conditions with suboptimal treatment options. Botulinum toxin chemodenervation is typically the first-line treatment and is considered the gold standard. However, patient response to botulinum toxin varies widely. There is anecdotal evidence for the use of cannabinoids in treating laryngeal dystonia with a scarcity of research investigating this potential treatment option. The primary objective of this study is to survey patients with laryngeal dystonia and vocal tremor to gauge how some people are using cannabinoids to treat their condition and to ascertain patient perceptions of cannabinoid effectiveness.
This is a cross-sectional survey study.
An eight-question anonymous survey was distributed to people with abductor spasmodic dysphonia adductor spasmodic dysphonia, vocal tremor, muscle tension dysphonia, and mixed laryngeal dystonia via the Dysphonia International (formerly National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association) email listserv.
158 responses: 25 males and 133 females, (mean [range] age, 64.9 [22-95] years). 53.8% of participants had tried cannabinoids for the purposes of treating their condition at some point, with 52.9% of this subset actively using cannabis as part of their treatment. Most participants who have used cannabinoids as a treatment rank their effectiveness as somewhat effective (42.4%) or ineffective (45.9%). Participants cited a reduction in voice strain and anxiety as reasons for cannabinoid effectiveness.
People with laryngeal dystonia and/or vocal tremor currently use or have tried using cannabinoids as a treatment for their condition. Cannabinoids were better received as a supplementary treatment than as a stand-alone treatment.
目的/假设:喉肌张力障碍和声带震颤可能是使人衰弱的病症,治疗选择并不理想。肉毒杆菌毒素化学去神经支配通常是一线治疗方法,被视为金标准。然而,患者对肉毒杆菌毒素的反应差异很大。有传闻证据表明大麻素可用于治疗喉肌张力障碍,但对此潜在治疗选择进行研究的却很少。本研究的主要目的是对喉肌张力障碍和声带震颤患者进行调查,以了解一些人如何使用大麻素治疗其病症,并确定患者对大麻素疗效的看法。
这是一项横断面调查研究。
通过国际发声障碍协会(原国家痉挛性发声障碍协会)的电子邮件列表,向患有外展性痉挛性发声障碍、内收性痉挛性发声障碍、声带震颤、肌张力性发声障碍和混合性喉肌张力障碍的患者发放了一份包含八个问题的匿名调查问卷。
共收到158份回复,其中男性25人,女性133人,(平均[范围]年龄为64.9[22 - 95]岁)。53.8%的参与者曾在某些时候尝试使用大麻素治疗其病症,其中52.9%的这一部分人积极将大麻作为其治疗的一部分。大多数将大麻素用作治疗方法的参与者将其疗效评为“有点有效”(42.4%)或“无效”(45.9%)。参与者提到声音紧张和焦虑减轻是大麻素有效的原因。
患有喉肌张力障碍和/或声带震颤的人目前正在使用或曾尝试使用大麻素治疗其病症。大麻素作为辅助治疗比作为单一治疗更易被接受。