Department of Epidemiology, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Building, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16072-1.
INTRODUCTION: Mississippi has one of the highest rates of HIV in the United States but low PrEP uptake. Understanding patterns of PrEP use can improve PrEP initiation and persistence. METHODS: This is a mixed-method evaluation of a PrEP program in Jackson, Mississippi. Between November 2018-December 2019, clients at high risk for HIV attending a non-clinical testing site were referred to a pharmacist for same-day PrEP initiation. The pharmacist provided a 90-day PrEP prescription and scheduled a follow-up clinical appointment within three months. We linked client records from this visit to electronic health records from the two largest PrEP clinics in Jackson to determine linkage into ongoing clinical care. We identified four distinct PrEP use patterns, which we used for qualitative interview sampling: 1) filled a prescription and linked into care within three months; 2) filled a prescription and linked into care after three months; 3) filled a prescription and never linked into care; and 4) never filled a prescription. In 2021, we purposively sampled patients in these four groups for individual interviews to ascertain barriers and facilitators to PrEP initiation and persistence, using guides informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. RESULTS: There were 121 clients evaluated for PrEP; all were given a prescription. One-third were less than 25 years old, 77% were Black, and 59% were cisgender men who have sex with men. One-quarter (26%) never filled their PrEP prescription, 44% picked up the prescription but never linked into clinical care, 12% linked into care at some point after three months (resulting in a gap in PrEP coverage), and 18% linked into care within 3 months. We interviewed 26 of 121 clients. Qualitative data revealed that cost, stigmas related to sexuality and HIV, misinformation about PrEP, and perceived side effects were barriers to uptake and persistence. Individuals' desire to stay healthy and the support of PrEP clinic staff were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of individuals given a same-day PrEP prescription either never started PrEP or stopped PrEP within the first three months. Addressing noted barriers of stigma and misinformation and reducing structural barriers may increase PrEP initiation and persistence.
引言:密西西比州是美国艾滋病毒感染率最高的州之一,但接受 PrEP 的人数却很少。了解 PrEP 的使用模式可以改善 PrEP 的启动和持续使用。
方法:这是对密西西比州杰克逊市 PrEP 项目的一项混合方法评估。在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,在非临床检测点接受 HIV 高危检测的高危客户被转介给药剂师,以便当天开始 PrEP 治疗。药剂师提供 90 天的 PrEP 处方,并在三个月内安排一次随访临床预约。我们将此次就诊的客户记录与杰克逊市两家最大的 PrEP 诊所的电子健康记录相链接,以确定是否已链接到持续的临床护理中。我们确定了四种不同的 PrEP 使用模式,我们使用这些模式进行定性访谈抽样:1)在三个月内填写处方并链接到护理;2)在三个月后填写处方并链接到护理;3)填写处方但从未链接到护理;4)从未填写处方。在 2021 年,我们根据计划行为理论的指导,针对这四个组的患者进行了有针对性的个人访谈,以确定 PrEP 启动和持续使用的障碍和促进因素。
结果:有 121 名患者接受了 PrEP 评估;所有人都拿到了处方。三分之一的人年龄小于 25 岁,77%是黑人,59%是跨性别男性,他们与男性发生性行为。四分之一(26%)从未服用过 PrEP 处方,44%的人拿到了处方,但从未链接到临床护理,12%的人在三个月后某一时间链接到护理(导致 PrEP 覆盖出现缺口),18%的人在 3 个月内链接到护理。我们对 121 名患者中的 26 名进行了采访。定性数据显示,费用、与性和 HIV 相关的污名、有关 PrEP 的错误信息以及对副作用的误解是影响接受度和持续度的障碍。个人对健康的渴望和 PrEP 诊所工作人员的支持是促进因素。
结论:大多数接受当天 PrEP 处方的人要么从未开始 PrEP,要么在头三个月内停止服用 PrEP。解决污名化和错误信息方面的问题,并减少结构性障碍,可能会提高 PrEP 的启动和持续使用。
BMC Public Health. 2023-6-13
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2023-7
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024-3
Lancet HIV. 2022-4
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023-4
Lancet. 2021-3-20