Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jun 14;22(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01917-3.
Minority social status determined by religion, caste and tribal group affiliations, are usually treated as independent dimensions of inequities in India. This masks relative privileges and disadvantages at the intersections of religion-caste and religion-tribal group affiliations, and their associations with population health disparities.
Our analysis was motivated by applications of the intersectionality framework in public health, which underlines how different systems of social stratification mutually inform relative access to material resources and social privilege, that are associated with distributions of population health. Based on this framework and using nationally representative National Family Health Surveys of 1992-93, 1998-99, 2005-06, 2015-16 and 2019-21, we estimated joint disparities by religion-caste and religion-tribe, for prevalence of stunting, underweight and wasting in children between 0-5 years of age. As indicators of long- and short-term growth interruptions, these are key population health indicators capturing developmental potential of children. Our sample included Hindu and Muslim children of < = 5 years, who belonged to Other (forward) castes (the most privileged social group), Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Schedule Castes (SCs) and Schedule Tribe (STs). Hindu-Other (forward) caste, as the strata with the dual advantages of religion and social group was specified as the reference category. We specified Log Poisson models to estimate multiplicative interactions of religion- caste and religion-tribe identities on risk ratio scales. We specified variables that may be associated with caste, tribe, or religion, as dimensions of social hierarchy, and/or with child growth as covariates, including fixed effects for states, survey years, child's age, sex, household urbanicity, wealth, maternal education, mother's height, and weight. We assessed patterns in growth outcomes by intersectional religion-caste and religion-tribe subgroups nationally, assessed their trends over the last 30 years, and across states.
The sample comprised 6,594, 4,824, 8,595, 40,950 and 3,352 Muslim children, and 37,231, 24,551, 35,499, 1,87,573 and 171,055 Hindu children over NFHS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. As one example anthropometric outcome, predicted prevalence of stunting among different subgroups were as follows- Hindu Other: 34.7% (95%CI: 33.8, 35.7), Muslim Other: 39.2% (95% CI: 38, 40.5), Hindu OBC: 38.2 (95%CI: 37.1, 39.3), Muslim OBC: 39.6% (95%CI: 38.3, 41), Hindu SCs: 39.5% (95%CI: 38.2, 40.8), Muslims identifying as SCs: 38.5% (95%CI: 35.1, 42.3), Hindu STs: 40.6% (95% CI: 39.4, 41.9), Muslim STs: 39.7% (95%CI: 37.2, 42.4). Over the last three decades, Muslims always had higher prevalence of stunting than Hindus across caste groups. But this difference doubled for the most advantaged castes (Others) and reduced for OBCs (less privileged caste group). For SCs, who are the most disadvantaged caste group, the Muslim disadvantage reversed to an advantage. Among tribes (STs), Muslims always had an advantage, which reduced over time. Similar directions and effect sizes were estimated for prevalence of underweight. For prevalence of wasting, effect sizes were in the same range, but not statistically significant for two minority castes-OBCs and SCs.
Hindu children had the highest advantages over Muslim children when they belonged to the most privileged castes. Muslim forward caste children were also disadvantaged compared to Hindu children from deprived castes (Hindu OBCs and Hindu SCs), in the case of stunting. Thus, disadvantages from a socially underprivileged religious identity, seemed to override relative social advantages of forward caste identity for Muslim children. Disadvantages born of caste identity seemed to take precedence over the social advantages of Hindu religious identity, for Hindu children of deprived castes and tribes. The doubly marginalized Muslim children from deprived castes were always behind their Hindu counter parts, although their differentials were less than that of Muslim-Hindu children of forward castes. For tribal children, Muslim identity seemed to play a protective role. Our findings indicate monitoring child development outcomes by subgroups capturing intersectional social experiences of relative privilege and access from intersecting religion and social group identities, could inform policies to target health disparities.
少数群体的社会地位由宗教、种姓和部落群体决定,在印度通常被视为不平等的独立维度。这掩盖了宗教-种姓和宗教-部落群体之间的相对特权和劣势,以及它们与人口健康差异的关联。
我们的分析受到公共卫生中交叉性框架的启发,该框架强调了不同的社会分层系统如何相互告知物质资源和社会特权的相对获取,这些特权与人口健康的分布有关。基于这一框架,并使用具有代表性的全国家庭健康调查(NFHS)1992-93 年、1998-99 年、2005-06 年、2015-16 年和 2019-21 年的数据,我们估计了宗教-种姓和宗教-部落之间的联合差异,以衡量 0-5 岁儿童的发育迟缓、消瘦和消瘦的患病率。作为长期和短期生长中断的指标,这些是关键的人口健康指标,反映了儿童的发展潜力。我们的样本包括属于其他(前)种姓(最受优待的社会群体)、其他落后种姓(OBC)、在册种姓(SCs)和在册部落(STs)的 0-5 岁的印度教徒和穆斯林儿童。印度教-其他(前)种姓作为具有宗教和社会群体双重优势的阶层,被指定为参考类别。我们指定了对数泊松模型,以估计宗教-种姓和宗教-部落身份在风险比尺度上的相互作用。我们指定了可能与种姓、部落或宗教相关的变量,以及与儿童生长相关的变量作为社会等级制度的维度,并将其作为协变量,包括州、调查年份、儿童年龄、性别、家庭城市、财富、母亲教育、母亲身高和体重的固定效应。我们在全国范围内按交叉性宗教-种姓和宗教-部落亚组评估了生长结果的模式,评估了过去 30 年来的趋势,并评估了各州的情况。
样本包括 NFHS1 中的 6594 名穆斯林儿童、4824 名印度教徒儿童、8595 名穆斯林儿童、40950 名印度教徒儿童和 3352 名穆斯林儿童,NFHS2 中的 37231 名印度教徒儿童、24551 名穆斯林儿童、35499 名印度教徒儿童、187573 名穆斯林儿童和 171055 名印度教徒儿童,NFHS3 中的 35731 名穆斯林儿童、23516 名印度教徒儿童、35499 名穆斯林儿童、187573 名印度教徒儿童和 171055 名印度教徒儿童,NFHS4 中的 40950 名穆斯林儿童、3352 名印度教徒儿童、40950 名穆斯林儿童和 3352 名印度教徒儿童,NFHS5 中的 3352 名穆斯林儿童和 37231 名印度教徒儿童。作为一个人体测量结果的例子,不同亚组的预测发育迟缓患病率如下:印度教其他:34.7%(95%CI:33.8,35.7),穆斯林其他:39.2%(95%CI:38,40.5),印度教 OBC:38.2(95%CI:37.1,39.3),穆斯林 OBC:39.6%(95%CI:38.3,41),印度教 SCs:39.5%(95%CI:38.2,40.8),穆斯林自称为 SCs:38.5%(95%CI:35.1,42.3),印度教 STs:40.6%(95%CI:39.4,41.9),穆斯林 STs:39.7%(95%CI:37.2,42.4)。在过去的三十年中,穆斯林儿童的发育迟缓患病率始终高于印度教徒,无论种姓群体如何。但对于最优越的种姓(其他人)来说,这种差异增加了一倍,而对于 OBC(较不优越的种姓群体)来说则减少了。对于 SCs 来说,他们是最弱势群体,穆斯林的劣势反而变成了优势。在部落(STs)中,穆斯林一直处于优势地位,这种优势随着时间的推移而减弱。对于消瘦的患病率,估计的方向和效应大小相似。对于消瘦的患病率,效应大小处于相同范围,但对两个少数民族种姓-OBC 和 SC 来说,没有统计学意义。
当印度教徒属于最受优待的种姓时,他们比穆斯林儿童享有更高的优势。穆斯林前种姓儿童与印度教贫困种姓(印度教 OBC 和印度教 SCs)的儿童相比,在发育迟缓方面也处于劣势。因此,穆斯林儿童的社会劣势似乎超过了他们在宗教上的相对优势。对于印度教贫困种姓和部落的儿童来说,种姓身份带来的劣势似乎优先于印度教宗教身份带来的社会优势。一直处于劣势的穆斯林贫困种姓儿童总是落后于他们的印度教同龄人,尽管他们之间的差距小于穆斯林和印度教前种姓儿童之间的差距。对于部落儿童来说,穆斯林身份似乎发挥了保护作用。我们的研究结果表明,通过按相对特权和接触宗教和社会群体身份的交叉性来监测儿童发展结果,可以为针对健康差异的政策提供信息。