Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 15;23(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01957-x.
Improving the health and well-being of young people is a public health priority. Schools present an ideal setting to implement strategies to improve young people's health and well-being. A key strategy involves conducting surveys to assess student health needs, inform interventions, and monitor health over time. Conducting research in schools is, however, challenging. Schools can find it difficult to participate and adhere to research processes, even when they are keen to be involved in research, because of competing priorities (e.g., attendance and educational achievement), as well as time and resource constraints. There is a lack of literature on the perspectives of school staff and other key stakeholders working in young people's health on how best to work with schools to conduct health research, and in particular, health surveys.
Participants (n = 26) included members of staff from 11 secondary schools (covering students aged 11-16 years), 5 local authority professionals, and 10 wider key stakeholders in young people's health and well-being (e.g., a school governor, a national government member), based in South West England. Participants took part in semi-structured interviews that were conducted either over the phone or via an online platform. Data were analysed using the Framework Method.
Three main themes were identified: Recruitment and Retention, Practicalities of Data Collection in Schools, and Collaboration from Design to Dissemination. It is important to acknowledge the role of local authorities and academy trusts in the English education system, and work closely with these when conducting school-based health surveys. School staff prefer to be contacted about research via email and in the summer term, following exams. Researchers should contact a member of staff involved in student health/well-being, as well as senior leadership, during recruitment. Data collection during the start and end of the school year is undesirable. Research should be collaborative with school staff and young people, consistent with school priorities and values, and flexible and tailored to school timetables and resources.
Overall the findings demonstrate that survey-based research methods should be school-led and tailored to each school.
提高年轻人的健康和福祉是公共卫生的重点。学校是实施改善年轻人健康和福祉战略的理想场所。一项关键策略是进行调查,评估学生的健康需求,为干预措施提供信息,并随着时间的推移监测健康状况。然而,在学校进行研究具有挑战性。即使学校热衷于参与研究,由于优先事项(例如出勤率和教育成绩)的竞争,以及时间和资源的限制,学校也会发现很难参与并遵守研究过程。关于与学校合作进行健康研究,特别是健康调查的最佳方法,缺乏针对从事年轻人健康工作的学校工作人员和其他主要利益相关者的观点的文献。
参与者(n=26)包括来自 11 所中学(涵盖 11-16 岁学生)的工作人员、5 名地方当局专业人员以及 10 名年轻人健康和福祉的更广泛主要利益相关者(例如学校理事、国家政府成员),他们位于英格兰西南部。参与者参加了半结构化访谈,可以通过电话或在线平台进行。使用框架方法对数据进行分析。
确定了三个主要主题:招募和保留、在学校进行数据收集的实际问题以及从设计到传播的协作。在进行基于学校的健康调查时,了解英国教育系统中地方当局和学院信托的作用并与之密切合作很重要。学校工作人员更喜欢通过电子邮件在考试后的夏季学期收到有关研究的通知。在招募过程中,研究人员应该联系参与学生健康/福利的工作人员以及高级领导层。在学年开始和结束时进行数据收集是不理想的。研究应该与学校工作人员和年轻人合作,与学校的优先事项和价值观保持一致,并且灵活且适应学校的时间表和资源。
总的来说,研究结果表明,基于调查的研究方法应该以学校为主导,并根据每所学校的情况进行调整。