Saesen Robbe, Machado Matilde, Crifo Bianca, Liu Lifang, de Vries Corinne, Herold Ralf, Llinares Garcia Jordi, Huys Isabelle
Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 30;10:1181702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1181702. eCollection 2023.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) interacts with many different stakeholders involved in the development of drugs, including academic researchers. In recent years, EMA has collaborated more closely with academia, by taking part in external research projects such as those set up under the Horizon 2020 program in general and the Innovative Medicines Initiative in particular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived added value of EMA's involvement in these projects, both from the perspective of the Agency's participating Scientific Officers and of the coordinators of the consortia that undertook them.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the coordinators of 21 ongoing or recently finalized projects in which EMA has participated, as well as with the Agency experts contributing to them.
In total, 40 individuals were interviewed, of whom 23 were project coordinators and 17 were EMA staff members. While most of the projects were reported to suffer from delays due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the consortia adapted to the circumstances and their members still expected to deliver on their objectives. EMA's input into the projects ranged from providing guidance by reviewing documents and attending meetings to creating project materials and disseminating them. The frequency of communication between EMA and the consortia varied widely. The projects generated a diverse set of outputs, which encompassed new or improved medicinal products, methodological standards, research infrastructures, and educational tools. All of the coordinators expressed that EMA's contributions to their projects had increased the scientific relevance of their consortium's work, and the EMA experts found that the knowledge and the deliverables produced by the projects were valuable, taking into consideration the time they had invested into them. In addition, interviewees highlighted some actions which could be taken to increase the regulatory significance of the project outcomes.
EMA's engagement in external research projects benefits the consortia conducting them and supports the Agency's mission to foster scientific excellence and advance regulatory science.
欧洲药品管理局(EMA)与参与药物研发的许多不同利益相关者互动,包括学术研究人员。近年来,EMA通过参与外部研究项目,与学术界开展了更密切的合作,这些项目一般是在“地平线2020”计划下设立的,特别是在创新药物计划中。本研究的目的是从该机构参与项目的科学官员以及开展这些项目的联盟协调员的角度,评估EMA参与这些项目所带来的感知附加值。
对EMA参与的21个正在进行或最近完成的项目的协调员以及参与其中的该机构专家进行了半结构化访谈。
总共采访了40人,其中23人是项目协调员,17人是EMA工作人员。虽然大多数项目据报告因新冠疫情而延迟,但联盟适应了情况,其成员仍期望实现目标。EMA对项目的投入范围从通过审查文件和参加会议提供指导到创建项目材料并进行传播。EMA与联盟之间的沟通频率差异很大。这些项目产生了各种各样的成果,包括新的或改进的药品、方法标准、研究基础设施和教育工具。所有协调员都表示,EMA对其项目的贡献提高了其联盟工作的科学相关性,而EMA专家发现,考虑到他们投入的时间,这些项目产生的知识和可交付成果是有价值的。此外,受访者强调了一些可以采取的行动,以提高项目成果的监管意义。
EMA参与外部研究项目有利于开展这些项目的联盟,并支持该机构促进科学卓越和推进监管科学的使命。