FitzRoy Felix, Jin Jim, Nolan Michael
School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AL UK.
Faculty of Business, Law and Politics, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX UK.
J Econ (Vienna). 2023;139(3):177-190. doi: 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
To counteract excessive effort due to relative income comparison among identical agents, the literature suggests a tax response equal to the negative externality. Assuming a general income distribution, we show that an optimal tax must be higher under a general social welfare function, to not only reduce inefficiency but also inequality. We recommend a practical tax response to stronger comparison - to hold employment constant, which does not require unrealistic information including unobservable comparison. Surprisingly, the tax response will dominate the comparison effect and labour supply or reverse "keeping up with the Joneses" on intensive margins, and also reverse the otherwise rising inequality.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2.
为抵消相同主体之间相对收入比较所导致的过度努力,文献表明税收应对措施应等同于负外部性。假设收入分布一般,我们表明在一般社会福利函数下最优税收必须更高,这不仅是为了减少无效率,也是为了减少不平等。我们建议针对更强比较的一种实际税收应对措施——保持就业不变,这并不需要包括不可观察比较在内的不切实际的信息。令人惊讶的是,税收应对措施将在边际上主导比较效应和劳动力供给,或者扭转“攀比”现象,并且还会扭转原本加剧的不平等。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s00712-023-00821-2获取的补充材料。