Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Behavioral and Policy Sciences Department, RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct;73(5):461-479. doi: 10.3322/caac.21801. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
There remains a need to synthesize linkages between social determinants of health (SDOH) and cancer screening to reduce persistent inequities contributing to the US cancer burden. The authors conducted a systematic review of US-based breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening intervention studies to summarize how SDOH have been considered in interventions and relationships between SDOH and screening. Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed research articles published in English between 2010 and 2021. The Covidence software platform was used to screen articles and extract data using a standardized template. Data items included study and intervention characteristics, SDOH intervention components and measures, and screening outcomes. The findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and narratives. The review included 144 studies among diverse population groups. SDOH interventions increased screening rates overall by a median of 8.4 percentage points (interquartile interval, 1.8-18.8 percentage points). The objective of most interventions was to increase community demand (90.3%) and access (84.0%) to screening. SDOH interventions related to health care access and quality were most prevalent (227 unique intervention components). Other SDOH, including educational, social/community, environmental, and economic factors, were less common (90, 52, 21, and zero intervention components, respectively). Studies that included analyses of health policy, access to care, and lower costs yielded the largest proportions of favorable associations with screening outcomes. SDOH were predominantly measured at the individual level. This review describes how SDOH have been considered in the design and evaluation of cancer screening interventions and effect sizes for SDOH interventions. Findings may guide future intervention and implementation research aiming to reduce US screening inequities.
仍然需要综合考虑健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)与癌症筛查之间的联系,以减少导致美国癌症负担的持续不平等因素。作者对美国基于乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌筛查的干预研究进行了系统回顾,以总结社会决定因素在干预措施中的考虑以及社会决定因素与筛查之间的关系。在英语发表的 2010 年至 2021 年期间,从五个数据库中搜索了同行评议的研究文章。使用 Covidence 软件平台筛选文章并使用标准化模板提取数据。数据项包括研究和干预特征、SDOH 干预组成部分和措施以及筛查结果。使用描述性统计和叙述总结发现。该综述包括来自不同人群的 144 项研究。SDOH 干预措施总体上使筛查率提高了中位数 8.4 个百分点(四分位距,1.8-18.8 个百分点)。大多数干预措施的目的是增加社区对筛查的需求(90.3%)和获取(84.0%)。与医疗保健获取和质量相关的 SDOH 干预措施最为普遍(227 个独特的干预组成部分)。其他 SDOH,包括教育、社会/社区、环境和经济因素,相对较少(分别为 90、52、21 和 0 个干预组成部分)。包括对卫生政策、获取医疗服务和降低成本进行分析的研究,与筛查结果的关联比例最大。SDOH 主要在个体层面进行测量。本综述描述了社会决定因素在癌症筛查干预措施的设计和评估中是如何被考虑的,以及社会决定因素干预措施的效果大小。研究结果可能为旨在减少美国筛查不平等的未来干预和实施研究提供指导。