• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国健康社会决定因素与癌症筛查实施和效果的系统评价方案

Social determinants of health and cancer screening implementation and outcomes in the USA: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.

Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 8;11(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4
PMID:35676720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9175338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving the delivery, uptake, and implementation of cancer screening to meet evidence-based recommendations is needed to reduce persistent cancer health disparities in the USA. Current national public health targets emphasize the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) on cancer screening. However, there remains a need to explicate these linkages, toward the goal of identifying and implementing effective interventions that target and address SDOH to reduce inequities in cancer screening.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review of English language peer-reviewed original research articles published between 2010 and 2021 that describe observational (qualitative and quantitative) and intervention studies conducted in the USA. In alignment with Healthy People 2030, we will include studies of breast, cervical, colorectal, and/or lung cancer screening. Guided by multiple SDOH frameworks, we will broadly define SDOH by five domain areas: economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context. Following systematic literature searches in five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and piloting of screening procedures, reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts for potential relevance. Reviewer pairs will then screen full text articles for eligibility criteria. We will extract data items from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening intervention information, and coding of SDOH constructs. We will assess study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and synthesize our findings using narrative, descriptive statistics, tables, and figures. Our approach will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations.

DISCUSSION

By completing this systematic review, we will summarize recent literature on SDOH and cancer screening, identify research gaps for inclusion of SDOH, and propose future opportunities for advancing equity in cancer screening by integrating SDOH as part of the implementation context to promote uptake, sustainability, and scale-up in the implementation of screening guidelines.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021276582 .

摘要

背景

为了减少美国持续存在的癌症健康差异,需要改善癌症筛查的提供、接受和实施,以符合循证建议。当前的国家公共卫生目标强调了社会决定因素(SDOH)对癌症筛查的作用。然而,仍有必要详细说明这些联系,以确定和实施有效的干预措施,针对和解决 SDOH,从而减少癌症筛查中的不平等。

方法

我们将对 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的英语同行评审原始研究文章进行系统回顾,这些文章描述了在美国进行的观察性(定性和定量)和干预研究。根据《健康人民 2030》,我们将包括乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和/或肺癌筛查的研究。根据多个 SDOH 框架,我们将通过五个领域广泛定义 SDOH:经济稳定性、教育机会和质量、医疗保健机会和质量、邻里和建筑环境以及社会和社区环境。在对五个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library)进行系统文献检索和筛选程序试点后,审查员将独立筛选标题/摘要以确定其相关性。审查员对将然后筛选全文文章以确定是否符合入选标准。我们将从纳入的文章中提取数据项,包括研究特征、癌症筛查干预信息和 SDOH 结构的编码。我们将使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量,并使用叙述、描述性统计、表格和图形综合我们的发现。我们的方法将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议。

讨论

通过完成这项系统回顾,我们将总结最近关于 SDOH 和癌症筛查的文献,确定纳入 SDOH 的研究空白,并提出通过将 SDOH 作为实施背景的一部分纳入未来机会,以促进筛查指南的接受、可持续性和扩大规模,从而推进癌症筛查中的公平性。

系统审查注册

PROSPERO CRD42021276582。

相似文献

1
Social determinants of health and cancer screening implementation and outcomes in the USA: a systematic review protocol.美国健康社会决定因素与癌症筛查实施和效果的系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 8;11(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.社会决定因素与美国癌症筛查干预措施:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct;73(5):461-479. doi: 10.3322/caac.21801. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
7
Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Teledentistry From the Perspective of Dental Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Review.从牙科保健专业人员角度看实施远程牙科的障碍与推动因素:一项系统的定量、定性和混合研究综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;12:e44218. doi: 10.2196/44218.
8
Social determinants of alcohol-related traumatic injury in young adults: a scoping review protocol.社会决定因素对年轻人酒精相关创伤性损伤的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e074653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074653.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.利用健康的社会决定因素提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的成本效益:系统评价。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1434-1444. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1460.
10
The impact of cash transfers on social determinants of health and health inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol.现金转移对撒哈拉以南非洲地区健康的社会决定因素及健康不平等的影响:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;5(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0295-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for improving adherence to amblyopia treatments in children.改善儿童弱视治疗依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015820.pub2.
2
A Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Health Among Cancer Survivors.癌症幸存者心血管健康的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;22(6):920. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060920.
3
Reply to: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Social Vulnerability Index: Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic.回复:结直肠癌筛查与社会脆弱性指数:COVID-19大流行的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4563-4564. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15302-z. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Social Determinants of Health and the Link to Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.社会决定因素与结直肠癌结局的关系。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Apr;25(4):453-464. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01191-7. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.高社区水平社会脆弱性与肢体和躯干软组织肉瘤切除后无复发生存(RFS)较差相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):4138-4147. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15074-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
6
Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.社会决定因素与青光眼健康差异:综述。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr;52(3):276-293. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14367. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
7
Machine Learning as a Tool for Early Detection: A Focus on Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer across Socioeconomic Spectrums.机器学习作为早期检测的工具:聚焦社会经济各阶层的晚期结直肠癌
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;16(3):540. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030540.
8
DeepBiomarker2: Prediction of Alcohol and Substance Use Disorder Risk in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Patients Using Electronic Medical Records and Multiple Social Determinants of Health.深度生物标志物2:利用电子病历和多种健康社会决定因素预测创伤后应激障碍患者的酒精和物质使用障碍风险
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 14;14(1):94. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010094.
9
Social Determinants of Dry Eye in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国干眼的社会决定因素:一项系统综述。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 May;261:36-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
Prediction of adverse events risk in patients with comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorder using electronic medical records by deep learning models.使用深度学习模型通过电子病历预测创伤后应激障碍和酒精使用障碍共病患者的不良事件风险
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Feb 1;255:111066. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111066. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
3
Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity.实施科学应该更加重视卫生公平。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0.
4
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
5
Cancer Screening Test Receipt - United States, 2018.癌症筛查测试收据 - 美国,2018 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 15;70(2):29-35. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7002a1.
6
Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.卫生政策实施决定因素及结果的定量评估:一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 19;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.利用健康的社会决定因素提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的成本效益:系统评价。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1434-1444. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1460.
8
A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health.系统评价实证研究考察健康实施机制。
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00983-3.
9
Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: A blueprint for practice, research, and policy.了解和应对社会决定因素,以促进美国癌症健康公平:实践、研究和政策蓝图。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):31-46. doi: 10.3322/caac.21586. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.宫颈癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897.