Suppr超能文献

以医师为导向的临床决策支持与以患者为导向的教育促进慢性疼痛阿片类药物合理应用的群组随机对照效果试验

Cluster-Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Physician-Directed Clinical Decision Support Versus Patient-Directed Education to Promote Appropriate Use of Opioids for Chronic Pain.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Pain. 2023 Oct;24(10):1745-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of physician-directed clinical decision support (CDS) administered via electronic health record versus patient-directed education to promote the appropriate use of opioids by conducting a cluster-randomized trial involving 82 primary care physicians and 951 of their patients with chronic pain. Primary outcomes were satisfaction with patient-physician communication consumer assessment of health care providers and system clinician and group survey (CG-CAHPS) and pain interference patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. Secondary outcomes included physical function (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system), depression (PHQ-9), high-risk opioid prescribing (>90 morphine milligram equivalents per day [≥90 mg morphine equivalent/day]), and co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. We used multi-level regression to compare longitudinal difference-in-difference scores between arms. The odds of achieving the maximum CG-CAHPS score were 2.65 times higher in the patient education versus the CDS arm (P = .044; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-6.80). However, baseline CG-CAHPS scores were dissimilar between arms, making these results challenging to interpret definitively. No difference in pain interference was found between groups (Coef = -0.64, 95% CI -2.66 to 1.38). The patient education arm experienced higher odds of Rx ≥ 90 milligrams morphine equivalent/day (odds ratio = 1.63; P = .010; 95% CI 1.13, 2.36). There were no differences between groups in physical function, depression, or co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. These results suggest that patient-directed education may have the potential to improve satisfaction with patient-physician communication, whereas physician-directed CDS via electronic health records may have greater potential to reduce high-risk opioid dosing. More evidence is needed to ascertain the relative cost-effectiveness between strategies. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the results of a comparative-effectiveness study of 2 broadly used communication strategies to catalyze dialog between patients and primary care physicians around chronic pain. The results add to the decision-making literature and offer insights about the relative benefits of physician-directed versus patient-directed interventions to promote the appropriate use of opioids.

摘要

我们通过一项涉及 82 名初级保健医生和 951 名慢性疼痛患者的聚类随机试验,比较了通过电子健康记录进行的医生指导的临床决策支持(CDS)与患者指导的教育对促进阿片类药物合理使用的效果。主要结果是患者对医患沟通的满意度、医疗保健提供者和系统临床医生的消费者评估以及小组调查(CG-CAHPS)和疼痛干扰患者报告的结果测量信息系统。次要结果包括身体功能(患者报告的结果测量信息系统)、抑郁(PHQ-9)、高风险阿片类药物处方(>90 毫克吗啡等效剂量/天[≥90mg 吗啡当量/天])以及阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的共同处方。我们使用多层次回归来比较手臂之间的纵向差异分数。与 CDS 组相比,患者教育组达到 CG-CAHPS 最高评分的几率高 2.65 倍(P=0.044;95%置信区间 [CI]1.03-6.80)。然而,手臂之间的基线 CG-CAHPS 评分不同,使得这些结果难以明确解释。两组之间的疼痛干扰无差异(Coef=-0.64,95%CI-2.66 至 1.38)。患者教育组 Rx≥90 毫克吗啡当量/天的几率更高(比值比=1.63;P=0.010;95%CI1.13,2.36)。两组之间在身体功能、抑郁或阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的共同处方方面没有差异。这些结果表明,患者指导的教育可能有潜力改善医患沟通的满意度,而电子健康记录的医生指导的 CDS 可能更有潜力减少高危阿片类药物剂量。需要更多证据来确定策略之间的相对成本效益。观点:本文介绍了一项比较两种广泛使用的沟通策略对促进慢性疼痛患者与初级保健医生之间对话的效果的比较有效性研究。研究结果增加了决策文献,并提供了有关医生指导与患者指导干预措施促进阿片类药物合理使用的相对益处的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验