• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩峰和肩胛冈应力骨折的危险因素因适应证不同而不同:ASES 反肩关节置换术后并发症多中心研究组的研究。

Risk factors of acromial and scapular spine stress fractures differ by indication: a study by the ASES Complications of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Multicenter Research Group.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2483-2492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.015
PMID:37330167
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both patient and implant related variables have been implicated in the incidence of acromial (ASF) and scapular spine fractures (SSF) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA); however, previous studies have not characterized nor differentiated risk profiles for varying indications including primary glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff (GHOA), rotator cuff arthropathy (CTA), and massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (MCT). The purpose of this study was to determine patient factors predictive of cumulative ASF/SSF risk for varying preoperative diagnosis and rotator cuff status.

METHODS

Patients consecutively receiving RSA between January 2013 and June 2019 from 15 institutions comprising 24 members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) with primary, preoperative diagnoses of GHOA, CTA and MCT were included for study. Inclusion criteria, definitions, and inclusion of patient factors in a multivariate model to predict cumulative risk of ASF/SSF were determined through an iterative Delphi process. The CTA and MCT groups were combined for analysis. Consensus was defined as greater than 75% agreement amongst contributors. Only ASF/SSF confirmed by clinical and radiographic correlation were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Our study cohort included 4764 patients with preoperative diagnoses of GHOA, CTA, or MCT with minimum follow-up of 3 months (range: 3-84). The incidence of cumulative stress fracture was 4.1% (n = 196). The incidence of stress fracture in the GHOA cohort was 2.1% (n = 34/1637) compared to 5.2% (n = 162/3127) (P < .001) in the CTA/MCT cohort. Presence of inflammatory arthritis (odds ratio [OR] 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-7.78; P = .035) was the sole predictive factor of stress fractures in GHOA, compared with inflammatory arthritis (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.89; P = .016), female sex (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20-2.72; P = .007), and osteoporosis (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.37; P = .003) in the CTA/MCT cohort.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative diagnosis of GHOA has a different risk profile for developing stress fractures after RSA than patients with CTA/MCT. Though rotator cuff integrity is likely protective against ASF/SSF, approximately 1/46 patients receiving RSA with primary GHOA will have this complication, primarily influenced by a history of inflammatory arthritis. Understanding risk profiles of patients undergoing RSA by varying diagnosis is important in counseling, expectation management, and treatment by surgeons.

摘要

背景

患者和植入物相关因素都与反肩关节置换(RSA)后肩峰(ASF)和肩胛脊柱骨折(SSF)的发生有关;然而,先前的研究尚未对不同适应证的风险特征进行描述和区分,包括原发性肩盂肱关节炎伴完整肩袖(GHOA)、肩袖关节炎(CTA)和巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂(MCT)。本研究旨在确定不同术前诊断和肩袖状态下与累积 ASF/SSF 风险相关的患者因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间来自 15 个机构的 24 名美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)的 RSA 患者,这些患者术前诊断为原发性 GHOA、CTA 和 MCT。通过迭代德尔菲法确定了包括患者因素在内的多变量模型来预测累积 ASF/SSF 风险的纳入标准、定义和纳入。CTA 和 MCT 组被合并进行分析。共识定义为贡献者之间的大于 75%的一致性。仅包括通过临床和影像学相关性证实的 ASF/SSF 进行分析。

结果

我们的研究队列包括了 4764 名术前诊断为 GHOA、CTA 或 MCT 的患者,最短随访时间为 3 个月(范围:3-84 个月)。累积应力骨折的发生率为 4.1%(n=196)。GHOA 组的应力骨折发生率为 2.1%(n=34/1637),而 CTA/MCT 组为 5.2%(n=162/3127)(P<.001)。炎性关节炎(比值比[OR]2.90,95%置信区间[CI]1.08-7.78;P=.035)是 GHOA 患者应力骨折的唯一预测因素,而炎性关节炎(OR 1.86,95% CI 1.19-2.89;P=.016)、女性(OR 1.81,95% CI 1.20-2.72;P=.007)和骨质疏松症(OR 1.56,95% CI 1.02-2.37;P=.003)是 CTA/MCT 组的预测因素。

结论

与 CTA/MCT 患者相比,GHOA 的 RSA 后应力骨折风险的术前诊断有不同的风险特征。尽管肩袖完整性可能对 ASF/SSF 有保护作用,但大约每 46 例接受 RSA 治疗的原发性 GHOA 患者中就会出现这种并发症,主要受炎性关节炎病史的影响。了解不同诊断下 RSA 患者的风险特征对于外科医生的咨询、期望管理和治疗很重要。

相似文献

1
Risk factors of acromial and scapular spine stress fractures differ by indication: a study by the ASES Complications of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Multicenter Research Group.肩峰和肩胛冈应力骨折的危险因素因适应证不同而不同:ASES 反肩关节置换术后并发症多中心研究组的研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2483-2492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Predictors of acromial and scapular stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES Complications of RSA Multicenter Research Group.反向肩关节置换术后肩峰和肩胛骨应力骨折的预测因素:ASES RSA 多中心研究组并发症研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2296-2305. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Indication matters: effect of indication on clinical outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-a multicenter study.适应证很重要:一项多中心研究显示反式全肩关节置换术后适应证与临床结果的关系。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6):1235-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.033. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Clinical Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Compared With Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Does Preoperative Diagnosis Make a Difference?原发性肩峰下撞击症与肩袖撕裂性关节炎患者行反式全肩关节置换术后的临床疗效比较:术前诊断有差异吗?
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 1;30(3):e415-e422. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00797.
5
Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component.罗伯特·H·科夫菲尔德医学博士 2023 年最佳口头报告奖:肱骨 135°插入式组件的反向肩关节置换术后,盂肱侧方移位达 8mm 并不增加肩峰或肩胛脊柱应力性骨折的风险。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6S):S1-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.018. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Do preoperative scapular fractures affect long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?术前肩胛骨骨折是否会影响反肩关节置换术后的长期疗效?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6S):S74-S79. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.028. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Patients 75 years or older with primary glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff show similar clinical improvement after reverse or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.对于 75 岁或以上的原发性肩盂肱关节炎且肩袖完整的患者,行反式或解剖全肩关节置换术后临床改善相似。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6):1254-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
8
Predictors of dislocations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES complications of RSA multicenter research group.反式肩关节置换术后脱位的预测因素:美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)RSA多中心研究组关于RSA并发症的一项研究
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan;33(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.028. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
Predictors of poor and excellent outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.肩袖完整的肩峰下撞击症行反肩关节置换术后预后不良和预后良好的预测因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6S):S55-S63. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.027. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis.对比炎性关节炎患者行反式肩关节置换术与全肩关节置换术的效果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.08.024. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender bias in glenosphere size selection in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Glenoid size correlates with height and weight, not just gender.反向全肩关节置换术中盂球窝尺寸选择的性别偏见:盂窝尺寸与身高和体重相关,而非仅与性别相关。
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 14;9(2):466-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.007. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis.解剖型或反式肩关节置换术治疗肩袖完整的盂肱关节骨关节炎。
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Mar 14:17585732251319977. doi: 10.1177/17585732251319977.
3
Anatomic versus reverse shoulder replacement: Are we asking the right questions and what are the answers?
解剖型与反置式肩关节置换:我们问对问题了吗?答案是什么?
J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Feb 4;17(3):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100225. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Coracoacromial ligament integrity influences scapular spine strain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.喙肩韧带完整性影响反式肩关节置换术后肩胛冈应变。
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 14;9(1):283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Perioperative Management, Complications, and Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病患者肩关节置换术的围手术期管理、并发症及结局
JBJS Rev. 2025 Jan 15;13(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00181. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
6
Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with higher 90-day systemic complications compared to osteoarthritis after total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.一项队列研究表明,与全肩关节置换术后的骨关节炎相比,类风湿性关节炎与90天全身并发症发生率更高相关。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Sep;27(3):353-360. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00374. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
7
Atraumatic scapular body fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series.全肩关节置换术后无创伤性肩胛体骨折:病例系列
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Feb 16;4(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.01.007. eCollection 2024 May.