Suppr超能文献

原发性肩峰下撞击症与肩袖撕裂性关节炎患者行反式全肩关节置换术后的临床疗效比较:术前诊断有差异吗?

Clinical Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Compared With Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Does Preoperative Diagnosis Make a Difference?

机构信息

From the New England Baptist Hospital Department of Sports Medicine, Boston, MA (Saini, Pettit, Puzzitiello, Shah, Jawa, and Kirsch), Boston Sports and Shoulder Center, MA (Hart, Jawa, and Kirsch), and New England Shoulder and Elbow Center, MA (Shah).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 1;30(3):e415-e422. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00797.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff compared with rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data including consecutive patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for GHOA or CTA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Baseline patient demographics and clinical outcomes including active range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of preoperative diagnosis on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of GHOA demonstrated significantly better postoperative active forward elevation (138.6° versus 127.3°; P < 0.01), external rotation (54.2° versus 43.8°; P < 0.01), and change in internal rotation (Δ 2.1 points versus Δ 1.2 points; P < 0.01). Patients with GHOA demonstrated significantly better postoperative ASES (86.8 versus 76.6; P < 0.01), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (89.7 versus 78.5; P < 0.01), and visual analog scale scores (0.63 versus 1.2; P < 0.01). Minimal clinically important difference for ASES score was achieved by 97.5% of patients with GHOA compared with 86.7% of patients with CTA (P < 0.01), whereas substantial clinical benefit was achieved by 90.4% of patients with GHOA and 71.7% of patients with CTA (P < 0.01). After a multivariate linear regression analysis, postoperative ASES scores were independently associated with previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery (P = 0.042), preoperative ASES score (P = 0.01), and primary diagnosis of GHOA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

RTSA performed in patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff is associated with improved functional and clinical outcomes compared with those patients treated for CTA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Therapeutic Study.

摘要

简介

本研究的主要目的是评估原发性肩峰下撞击症(GHOA)患者与肩袖撕裂性关节炎(CTA)患者行反向全肩关节置换术的临床结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究,包括接受原发性反向全肩关节置换术治疗 GHOA 或 CTA 的连续患者,随访时间至少 2 年。收集基线患者人口统计学和临床结果,包括主动活动范围、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分、单项评估数值评估和疼痛视觉模拟评分。进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估术前诊断对临床结果的影响。

结果

术前诊断为 GHOA 的患者术后主动前向抬高(138.6°对 127.3°;P < 0.01)、外旋(54.2°对 43.8°;P < 0.01)和内旋变化(Δ 2.1 点对 Δ 1.2 点;P < 0.01)明显更好。GHOA 患者术后 ASES(86.8 对 76.6;P < 0.01)、单项评估数值评估(89.7 对 78.5;P < 0.01)和视觉模拟评分(0.63 对 1.2;P < 0.01)明显更好。GHOA 患者中有 97.5%达到 ASES 评分的最小临床重要差异,而 CTA 患者中只有 86.7%(P < 0.01);GHOA 患者中有 90.4%和 CTA 患者中有 71.7%(P < 0.01)达到显著临床获益。多变量线性回归分析后,术后 ASES 评分与同侧肩部手术史(P = 0.042)、术前 ASES 评分(P = 0.01)和原发性 GHOA 诊断(P < 0.01)独立相关。

结论

与治疗 CTA 的患者相比,GHOA 且肩袖完整的患者行 RTSA 与功能和临床结果的改善相关。

证据水平

治疗性研究 III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验