Department of Emergency Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, United States of America.
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States of America.
Thromb Res. 2023 Aug;228:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
Deep vein thrombosis is a common and serious complication associated with midline catheters (MC). The aim of this investigation was to determine if catheter diameter is related to development of thrombosis.
This was an observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic center in Southeastern Michigan. Hospitalized adults that required a MC were eligible participants. Primary outcome was symptomatic MC associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) comparing three catheter diameters. Secondary outcomes included complications based on size and DVT comparing catheter to vein ratio.
Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, 3088 MCs met inclusion criteria; the distribution of 3 French (Fr), 4 Fr, and 5 Fr MCs was 35.1 %, 57.0 %, and 7.9 %, respectively. The majority of the population was female (61.2 %) and the average age was 64.2 years old. DVT occurred in 4.4 %, 3.9 %, and 11.9 % of 3 Fr, 4 Fr, and 5 Fr MCs, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, there was no difference in the odds of developing DVT for the 4 Fr MC compared to the 3 Fr (aOR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.59-1.31; p = 0.5243), however, there was significantly higher odds for the 5 Fr (aOR 2.72; 95 % CI 1.62-4.51; p = 0.001). Additionally, for every additional day the MC was in place, the odds of DVT increased by 3 % (aOR 1.03; 95 % CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.0039). When comparing accuracy of the size model versus catheter to vein ratio model for predicting DVT, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated the area under the curve for size was 73.70 % (95 % CI 68.04 %-79.36 %) compared to 73.01 % (95 % CI: 66.88 %-79.10 %) for catheter-to-vein ratio.
Smaller diameter catheters should be preferentially chosen to mitigate the risk of thrombosis when therapy via midline catheters is required. Choosing a catheter based on reduced size or 1:3 catheter to vein ratio threshold has similar accuracy in predicting DVT.
深静脉血栓形成是与中线导管(MC)相关的一种常见且严重的并发症。本研究旨在确定导管直径是否与血栓形成有关。
这是在密歇根州东南部的一家三级护理学术中心进行的观察性队列研究。需要 MC 的住院成人有资格成为参与者。主要结局是比较三种导管直径时,与症状性 MC 相关的上肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。次要结局包括基于大小的并发症和导管与静脉比的 DVT。
2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日,3088 根 MC 符合纳入标准;3Fr、4Fr 和 5Fr MC 的分布分别为 35.1%、57.0%和 7.9%。大多数患者为女性(61.2%),平均年龄为 64.2 岁。3Fr、4Fr 和 5Fr MC 分别发生 DVT 的比例为 4.4%、3.9%和 11.9%(p<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,与 3Fr 相比,4Fr MC 发生 DVT 的几率无差异(aOR 0.88;95%CI 0.59-1.31;p=0.5243),但 5Fr 的几率明显更高(aOR 2.72;95%CI 1.62-4.51;p=0.001)。此外,MC 放置的每增加一天,DVT 的几率增加 3%(aOR 1.03;95%CI 1.01-1.05;p=0.0039)。当比较大小模型与导管与静脉比模型预测 DVT 的准确性时,接受者操作特征曲线分析表明,大小模型的曲线下面积为 73.70%(95%CI 68.04%-79.36%),而导管与静脉比模型为 73.01%(95%CI:66.88%-79.10%)。
当需要通过中线导管进行治疗时,应优先选择较小直径的导管以降低血栓形成的风险。根据减少的尺寸或 1:3 导管与静脉比阈值选择导管在预测 DVT 方面具有相似的准确性。