Suppr超能文献

老年创伤性脑损伤患者生命维持治疗撤停的变化。

The Variation of Withdrawal of Life Sustaining Therapy in Older Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.05.020. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The decision to withdraw life sustaining treatment (WDLST) in older adults with traumatic brain injury is subject to wide variability leading to nonbeneficial interventions and unnecessary use of hospital resources. We hypothesized that patient and hospital factors are associated with WDLST and WDLST timing.

METHODS

All traumatic brain injury patients ≥65 with Glasgow coma scores (GCS) of 4-11 from 2018 to 2019 at level I and II centers were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients with head abbreviated injury scores 5-6 or death within 24 h were excluded. Bayesian additive regression tree analysis was performed to identify the cumulative incidence function (CIF) and the relative risks (RR) over time for withdrawal of care, discharge to hospice (DH), and death. Death alone (no WDLST or DH) served as the comparator group for all analyses. A subanalysis of the composite outcome WDLST/DH (defined as end-of-life-care), with death (no WDLST or DH) as a comparator cohort was performed.

RESULTS

We included 2126 patients, of whom 1957 (57%) underwent WDLST, 402 (19%) died, and 469 (22%) were DH. 60% of patients were male, and the mean age was 80 y. The majority of patients were injured by fall (76%, n = 1644). Patients who were DH were more often female (51% DH versus 39% WDLST), had a past medical history of dementia (45% DH versus 18% WDLST), and had lower admission injury severity score (14 DH versus 18.6 WDLST) (P < 0.001). Compared to those who DH, those who underwent WDLST had a lower GCS (9.8 versus 8.4, P < 0.001). CIF of WDSLT and DH increased with age, stabilizing by day 3. At day 3, patients ≥90 y had an increased RR of DH compared to WDLST (RR 2.5 versus 1.4). As GCS increased, CIF and RR of WDLST decreased, while CIF and RR of DH increased (RR on day 3 for GCS 12: WDLST 0.42 versus DH 1.31).Patients at nonprofit institutions were more likely to undergo WDLST (RR 1.15) compared to DH (0.68). Compared to patients of White race, patients of Black race had a lower RR of WDLST at all timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and hospital factors influence the practice of end-of-life-care (WDLST, DH, and death), highlighting the need to better understand variability to target palliative care interventions and standardize care across populations and trauma centers.

摘要

介绍

在患有创伤性脑损伤的老年人中决定停止维持生命的治疗(WDLST)的决策存在很大的差异,导致无益的干预和不必要的医院资源使用。我们假设患者和医院因素与 WDLST 和 WDLST 时机有关。

方法

从 2018 年至 2019 年,从 I 级和 II 级中心选择了所有年龄在 65 岁以上、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 4-11 的创伤性脑损伤患者,排除头部简短损伤评分 5-6 或 24 小时内死亡的患者。使用贝叶斯加性回归树分析来确定 WDLST 、出院到临终关怀(DH)和死亡的累积发生率函数(CIF)和相对风险(RR)。仅死亡(无 WDLST 或 DH)作为所有分析的对照组。对 WDLST/DH (定义为临终关怀)复合结局(无 WDLST 或 DH )进行了亚组分析。

结果

我们纳入了 2126 名患者,其中 1957 名(57%)进行了 WDLST,402 名(19%)死亡,469 名(22%)进行了 DH。60%的患者为男性,平均年龄为 80 岁。大多数患者是跌倒受伤(76%,n=1644)。DH 患者中女性患者更多(51% DH 与 39% WDLST),有痴呆病史(45% DH 与 18% WDLST),入院损伤严重程度评分较低(14 DH 与 18.6 WDLST)(P<0.001)。与接受 DH 的患者相比,接受 WDLST 的患者 GCS 较低(9.8 与 8.4,P<0.001)。WDSLT 和 DH 的 CIF 随年龄增加而增加,在第 3 天趋于稳定。在第 3 天,≥90 岁的患者与 WDLST 相比,DH 的 RR 增加(RR 2.5 与 1.4)。随着 GCS 的增加,WDLST 的 CIF 和 RR 降低,而 DH 的 CIF 和 RR 增加(第 3 天 GCS 12 的 RR :WDLST 0.42 与 DH 1.31)。非营利机构的患者比 DH (RR 1.15 与 0.68)更有可能进行 WDLST。与白人患者相比,黑人患者在所有时间点的 WDLST RR 均较低。

结论

患者和医院因素影响临终关怀(WDLST、DH 和死亡)的实践,这突出表明需要更好地了解变异性,以针对姑息治疗干预措施并在人群和创伤中心之间标准化护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验