• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套息肉切除术治疗 10-15mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性观察性初步研究。

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany,

Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Digestion. 2023;104(5):391-399. doi: 10.1159/000530642. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1159/000530642
PMID:37331350
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective procedure for small colorectal polyps ≤9 mm. There are only limited data regarding CSP of larger neoplastic lesions. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSP for polyps between 10 and 15 mm in size.

METHODS

In this prospective single-arm observational pilot study, patients with a least one polyp 10-15 mm were included. These polyps were preferably removed by CSP using a dedicated hybrid snare. The primary outcome was the histological complete resection rate (CRR) determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no neoplastic tissue obtained from biopsies of the resection site margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate, failure of CSP, and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 61 neoplastic polyps were removed from 39 patients. Overall CRR was 80.3% (49/61). CSP was feasible in 78.7% (48/61) of polyps and the CRR in this group was 85.4% (41/48). When CSP failed (13/61; 21.3%), lesions were successfully resected by immediate HSP using the same snare with a CRR of 61.5% (8/13) in this group. One patient presented delayed hemorrhage after HSP of a polyp but successful hemostasis was achieved with two hemoclips. No other adverse events occurred. No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in cases with incomplete resected polyps.

CONCLUSION

CSP seems to be efficient and safe in removing colorectal polyps up to 15 mm. A hybrid snare seems to be particularly advantageous for these polyps as it allows immediate conversion to HSP if CSP might fail in larger polyps. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04464837).

摘要

介绍

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)是一种安全有效的治疗直径≤9mm 的小结直肠息肉的方法。对于较大的肿瘤性病变,CSP 的相关数据有限。本研究评估了 CSP 切除 10-15mm 大小息肉的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项前瞻性单臂观察性研究中,纳入至少有一个 10-15mm 大小息肉的患者。这些息肉最好使用专用的混合圈套器进行 CSP 切除。主要终点是通过标本的病理阴性边缘和切除部位边缘活检未获得肿瘤组织来确定的组织学完全切除率(CRR)。次要终点是整块切除率、CSP 失败率和不良事件发生率。

结果

从 39 名患者中切除了 61 个肿瘤性息肉。总体 CRR 为 80.3%(49/61)。CSP 可用于 78.7%(48/61)的息肉,该组的 CRR 为 85.4%(41/48)。当 CSP 失败(13/61;21.3%)时,用相同的圈套器立即行 HSP,该组的 CRR 为 61.5%(8/13)。1 例 HSP 切除息肉后出现迟发性出血,但用两个止血夹成功止血。其他无不良事件发生。在不完全切除息肉的病例中,在随访结肠镜检查时未发现复发。

结论

CSP 切除直径达 15mm 的结直肠息肉似乎是有效且安全的。对于这些息肉,混合圈套器似乎特别有利,因为如果 CSP 可能在较大的息肉中失败,可以立即转换为 HSP。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04464837)注册。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗 10-15mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性观察性初步研究。
Digestion. 2023;104(5):391-399. doi: 10.1159/000530642. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
3
Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized control trial and one-year follow-up study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小结直肠息肉的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验及一年随访研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 11;100(23):e26296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026296.
4
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与热圈套切除术治疗结直肠小息肉内镜下切除的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 19;38(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2.
7
Pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm in diameter can be resected using cold snare polypectomy.直径≤1cm 的有蒂结直肠息肉可以使用冷圈套息肉切除术切除。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jul-Sep;84(3):411-415. doi: 10.51821/84.3.008.
8
Cold snare polypectomy vs. hot snare polypectomy vs. argon plasma coagulation for small (5-9mm) left-sided colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与热圈套息肉切除术和氩等离子体凝固术治疗左侧结直肠小息肉(5-9mm):一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e909-e915. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002300.
9
Cold snare polypectomy for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a prospective clinical trial (pilot study).冷圈套息肉切除术治疗非壶腹型十二指肠浅表层上皮性肿瘤:一项前瞻性临床试验(初步研究)。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5217-5223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08899-9. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠息肉后局部复发及其危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2918-2925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithmic approach for endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: an up-to-date review.结直肠息肉内镜治疗的算法方法:最新综述
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18(1):39-52. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.3085.